• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

结直肠癌易感性的基因检测:结直肠癌患者及其一级亲属的焦点小组反馈

Genetic testing for colorectal carcinoma susceptibility: focus group responses of individuals with colorectal carcinoma and first-degree relatives.

作者信息

Kinney A Y, DeVellis B M, Skrzynia C, Millikan R

机构信息

University of Utah College of Nursing, Salt Lake City, Utah 84112, USA.

出版信息

Cancer. 2001 Jan 1;91(1):57-65. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(20010101)91:1<57::aid-cncr8>3.0.co;2-u.

DOI:10.1002/1097-0142(20010101)91:1<57::aid-cncr8>3.0.co;2-u
PMID:11148560
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Colorectal carcinoma (CRC) may be the most frequent form of hereditary cancer. Genetic counseling and testing for heritable CRC is a promising approach for reducing the high incidence and mortality rates associated with the disease. Patients with CRC or those with at least one family member with the disease are the most likely persons to request or be offered genetic testing in the clinical or research setting. Currently, however, little is known about the behavioral, psychosocial, ethical, legal, and economic outcomes of CRC genetic counseling and testing.

METHODS

Eight focus group interviews, four for CRC patients (n = 28) and four for first-degree relatives (n = 33), were conducted to obtain insights into attitudes, beliefs, and informational needs about genetic testing for hereditary CRC.

RESULTS

Focus group interviews revealed a general lack of knowledge about cancer genetics and genetic testing; worry about confidentiality issues; strong concern for family members, particularly children; and a need for primary care providers to be informed about these issues. Major perceived advantages of genetic testing included improving health-related decisions, guiding physicians in making recommendations for surveillance, and informing relatives about risk potential. Disadvantages included potential discrimination, adverse psychologic effects, and financial costs associated with testing.

CONCLUSIONS

As knowledge and media coverage of genetics continue to expand, it becomes increasingly important to continue efforts on behalf of, and in partnership with, those individuals most affected by genetic testing for hereditary cancer syndromes. These findings provide data needed to develop and implement informational, educational, counseling, and research-oriented programs that are sensitive to individuals' concerns and preferences.

摘要

背景

结直肠癌(CRC)可能是遗传性癌症最常见的形式。对遗传性结直肠癌进行遗传咨询和检测是降低该疾病高发病率和死亡率的一种有前景的方法。患有结直肠癌的患者或至少有一名家庭成员患有该疾病的人是临床或研究环境中最有可能要求或接受基因检测的人群。然而,目前对于结直肠癌遗传咨询和检测的行为、心理社会、伦理、法律和经济结果知之甚少。

方法

进行了八次焦点小组访谈,其中四次针对结直肠癌患者(n = 28),四次针对一级亲属(n = 33),以深入了解对遗传性结直肠癌基因检测的态度、信念和信息需求。

结果

焦点小组访谈显示,普遍缺乏癌症遗传学和基因检测知识;担心保密问题;对家庭成员,尤其是孩子极为关注;并且需要让初级保健提供者了解这些问题。基因检测的主要预期优势包括改善与健康相关的决策、指导医生进行监测建议以及告知亲属潜在风险。劣势包括潜在的歧视、不良心理影响以及与检测相关的财务成本。

结论

随着遗传学知识和媒体报道的不断扩展,代表那些受遗传性癌症综合征基因检测影响最大的个人并与他们合作继续努力变得越来越重要。这些发现提供了制定和实施对个人关注和偏好敏感的信息、教育、咨询和研究项目所需的数据。

相似文献

1
Genetic testing for colorectal carcinoma susceptibility: focus group responses of individuals with colorectal carcinoma and first-degree relatives.结直肠癌易感性的基因检测:结直肠癌患者及其一级亲属的焦点小组反馈
Cancer. 2001 Jan 1;91(1):57-65. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(20010101)91:1<57::aid-cncr8>3.0.co;2-u.
2
American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement update: genetic testing for cancer susceptibility.美国临床肿瘤学会政策声明更新:癌症易感性基因检测
J Clin Oncol. 2003 Jun 15;21(12):2397-406. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.03.189. Epub 2003 Apr 11.
3
Correlates of intentions to obtain genetic counseling and colorectal cancer gene testing among at-risk relatives from three ethnic groups.三个种族有风险亲属中获得遗传咨询和结直肠癌基因检测意向的相关因素。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1999 Apr;8(4 Pt 2):329-36.
4
Attitudes towards genetic screening for predisposition to colon cancer among cancer patients, their relatives and members of the community. Results of focus group interviews.癌症患者、其亲属及社区成员对结肠癌易感性基因筛查的态度。焦点小组访谈结果。
Community Genet. 2003;6(1):29-36. doi: 10.1159/000069543.
5
Family history and colorectal cancer screening: a survey of physician knowledge and practice patterns.家族病史与结直肠癌筛查:医生知识与实践模式调查
Am J Gastroenterol. 2002 Apr;97(4):1031-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2002.05624.x.
6
[Hereditary colorectal carcinoma: predictive diagnosis and genetic counseling].[遗传性结直肠癌:预测性诊断与遗传咨询]
Praxis (Bern 1994). 2001 Mar 22;90(12):490-6.
7
Genetic counseling and testing in families with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer.遗传性非息肉病性结直肠癌家族中的遗传咨询与检测
Arch Intern Med. 2003 Mar 10;163(5):573-82. doi: 10.1001/archinte.163.5.573.
8
A social network analysis of communication about hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer genetic testing and family functioning.一项关于遗传性非息肉病性结直肠癌基因检测与家庭功能的交流的社会网络分析。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2003 Apr;12(4):304-13.
9
Genetic testing for susceptibility to breast cancer: findings from women's focus groups.
J Womens Health. 1997 Jun;6(3):317-27. doi: 10.1089/jwh.1997.6.317.
10
Colorectal cancer survivors undergoing genetic testing for hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer: motivational factors and psychosocial functioning.接受遗传性非息肉病性结直肠癌基因检测的结直肠癌幸存者:动机因素与心理社会功能
Clin Genet. 2007 Nov;72(5):394-401. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0004.2007.00893.x. Epub 2007 Sep 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Universal tumor screening for Lynch syndrome: Assessment of the perspectives of patients with colorectal cancer regarding benefits and barriers.林奇综合征的通用肿瘤筛查:评估结直肠癌患者对其益处和障碍的看法。
Cancer. 2015 Sep 15;121(18):3281-9. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29470. Epub 2015 Jun 2.
2
Applying public health screening criteria: how does universal newborn screening compare to universal tumor screening for Lynch syndrome in adults with colorectal cancer?应用公共卫生筛查标准:对于患有结直肠癌的成年人,新生儿普遍筛查与林奇综合征的普遍肿瘤筛查相比如何?
J Genet Couns. 2015 Jun;24(3):409-20. doi: 10.1007/s10897-014-9769-5. Epub 2014 Oct 18.
3
Attitudes toward Genetic Testing for Hypertension among African American Women and Girls.
非裔美国妇女和女孩对高血压基因检测的态度。
Nurs Res Pract. 2013;2013:341374. doi: 10.1155/2013/341374. Epub 2013 Nov 2.
4
Colorectal cancer survivors' interest in genetic testing for hereditary cancer: implications for universal tumor screening.结直肠癌幸存者对遗传性癌症基因检测的兴趣:对普遍肿瘤筛查的启示
Genet Test Mol Biomarkers. 2012 Jun;16(6):493-9. doi: 10.1089/gtmb.2011.0247. Epub 2012 Jan 6.
5
Preferences for genetic testing to identify hereditary colorectal cancer: perspectives of high-risk patients, community members, and clinicians.识别遗传性结直肠癌的基因检测偏好:高危患者、社区成员和临床医生的观点。
J Cancer Educ. 2012 Mar;27(1):112-9. doi: 10.1007/s13187-011-0286-z.
6
Challenges to the translation of genomic information into clinical practice and health policy: Utilization, preferences and economic value.将基因组信息转化为临床实践和卫生政策面临的挑战:利用、偏好和经济价值。
Curr Opin Mol Ther. 2008 Jun;10(3):260-6.
7
Referrals of patients to colorectal cancer genetics services in south-east Scotland.苏格兰东南部患者转介至结直肠癌遗传学服务机构的情况。
Fam Cancer. 2005;4(2):151-61. doi: 10.1007/s10689-004-4488-y.