Müller U, Hari Y, Berchtold E
Medical Division, Zieglerspital, Bern, Switzerland.
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2001 Jan;107(1):81-6. doi: 10.1067/mai.2001.111852.
Antihistamine premedication has been used to increase safety of specific-allergen immunotherapy. Its influence on the efficacy of this treatment has not been studied so far.
The goal was to analyze the influence of antihistamine premedication on long-term efficacy of specific-allergen immunotherapy.
Patients included in a double-blind, placebo controlled trial who received premedication with terfenadine or placebo during initial rush immunotherapy with honeybee venom in 1988/1989 were assessed in a retrospective analysis for the long-term protective effect, as indicated by the tolerance of a bee sting challenge or field sting during immunotherapy.
Of the 52 patients who had participated in the 1988/1989 trial, 47 could be reassessed after an average of 3 years. Of these, 45 were still receiving bee venom immunotherapy. A total of 41 patients were stung by bees while receiving immunotherapy (20 of the terfenadine-premedicated group and 21 of the placebo-premedicated group), 17 with in-field stings and 24 with in-hospital sting challenge. Six (29%) of the patients receiving placebo had a mild-to-moderate systemic allergic reaction, whereas none of the patients receiving terfenadine reacted to the bee sting (P =.012).
These results indicate that antihistamine premedication during the initial phase of specific-allergen immunotherapy may enhance the efficacy of this treatment.
抗组胺药预处理已被用于提高特异性变应原免疫疗法的安全性。目前尚未研究其对该治疗疗效的影响。
分析抗组胺药预处理对特异性变应原免疫疗法长期疗效的影响。
对1988/1989年在接受蜂毒初始快速免疫疗法期间接受特非那定或安慰剂预处理的双盲、安慰剂对照试验中的患者进行回顾性分析,以评估其长期保护作用,免疫疗法期间蜜蜂叮咬激发试验或野外叮咬的耐受性可作为指标。
在参与1988/1989年试验的52例患者中,平均3年后有47例可重新评估。其中,45例仍在接受蜂毒免疫疗法。共有41例患者在接受免疫疗法时被蜜蜂蜇伤(特非那定预处理组20例,安慰剂预处理组21例),17例为野外叮咬,24例为院内叮咬激发试验。接受安慰剂的患者中有6例(29%)出现轻至中度全身过敏反应,而接受特非那定的患者中无一例对蜜蜂叮咬有反应(P = 0.012)。
这些结果表明,特异性变应原免疫疗法初始阶段的抗组胺药预处理可能会提高该治疗的疗效。