Suppr超能文献

非洛地平、美托洛尔及其联合用药与安慰剂治疗老年单纯收缩期高血压的比较。

Felodipine, metoprolol and their combination compared with placebo in isolated systolic hypertension in the elderly.

作者信息

Wing L M, Russell A E, Tonkin A L, Bune A J, West M J, Chalmers J P

机构信息

Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Flinders Medical Centre, Bedford Park, Adelaide, Australia.

出版信息

Blood Press. 1994 Mar;3(1-2):82-9. doi: 10.3109/08037059409101526.

Abstract

This study compared with placebo the efficacy and tolerability of optimised doses of felodipine 5-20 mg daily, metoprolol 50-200 mg daily and their combination in subjects 60 years or over with isolated systolic hypertension. The study employed a randomised double-blind crossover design with allocation of treatment order within subjects by Latin squares. For each subject, after a single-blind run-in placebo phase, there were four randomised treatment phases each of six weeks duration, with a dose titration step at three weeks if necessary. Twenty-eight subjects entered the randomised phases of the study and twenty-one completed all four phases--13 male, 8 female (ages: median 71, range 59-85 years). At the end of both the felodipine and metoprolol phases systolic and diastolic pressure were reduced at 2 hours postdose compared with the placebo phase (p < 0.001), the blood pressure reduction with felodipine (-40/-20 mmHg) being greater than that with metoprolol (-15/-9 mmHg) (p < 0.01). Immediately predose (12 hours postdose) there was a persisting reduction of supine systolic blood pressure (-17 mmHg) with felodipine (p < 0.001), but there was no significant effect of metoprolol. At both measurement times the two drugs when in combination had an additive effect on blood pressure. There was a 20% increase in reported symptoms during each of the active treatment phases. Four subjects withdrew during the randomised phases because of probable drug-related adverse events and six subjects required dosage reductions during the felodipine or combination phases.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

本研究比较了每日5 - 20毫克氨氯地平、每日50 - 200毫克美托洛尔及其联合用药在60岁及以上单纯收缩期高血压患者中与安慰剂相比的疗效和耐受性。该研究采用随机双盲交叉设计,通过拉丁方在受试者内分配治疗顺序。对于每个受试者,在单盲导入安慰剂阶段后,有四个随机治疗阶段,每个阶段持续六周,必要时在三周进行剂量滴定。28名受试者进入研究的随机阶段,21名完成了所有四个阶段,其中13名男性,8名女性(年龄:中位数71岁,范围59 - 85岁)。在氨氯地平和美托洛尔阶段结束时,与安慰剂阶段相比,给药后2小时收缩压和舒张压均降低(p < 0.001),氨氯地平降低血压幅度(-40 / -20 mmHg)大于美托洛尔(-15 / -9 mmHg)(p < 0.01)。给药前即刻(给药后12小时),氨氯地平使仰卧位收缩压持续降低(-17 mmHg)(p < 0.001),但美托洛尔无显著影响。在两个测量时间点,两种药物联合使用时对血压有相加作用。在每个积极治疗阶段,报告的症状增加了20%。在随机阶段,4名受试者因可能与药物相关的不良事件退出,6名受试者在氨氯地平或联合用药阶段需要减少剂量。(摘要截断于250字)

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验