Dompeling E, Oudesluys-Murphy A M, Janssens H M, Hop W, Brinkman J G, Sukhai R N, de Jongste J C
Department of Paediatric Pulmonology, University Hospital Maastricht, P Debyelaan 25, PO Box 5800, 6202 AZ Maastricht, Netherlands.
Arch Dis Child. 2001 Feb;84(2):178-82. doi: 10.1136/adc.84.2.178.
Inhalation therapy using a pressured metered dose inhaler (pMDI) and a spacer is frequently used in the treatment of airway disease in children. Several laboratory studies found a clear negative influence of electrostatic charge (ESC) on plastic spacers on the delivery of aerosol.
To investigate whether ESC on plastic spacers could diminish bronchodilating responses to salbutamol.
Ninety asthmatic children (aged 4-8 years) were randomised into three groups: metal Nebuchamber, plastic Volumatic, and plastic Aerochamber. The bronchodilating response was measured by the change in peak expiratory flow rate (PEF) after 100 microgram and 400 microgram salbutamol. Within the Volumatic and Aerochamber groups, a crossover comparison was made between electrostatic and non-electrostatic spacers.
We found no significant effect of ESC on the bronchodilating response to salbutamol with any of the doses in the Aerochamber and Volumatic groups. For the plastic spacers, the mean difference of the change in PEF after 100 microgram salbutamol between non-electrostatic and electrostatic spacers was only +1.7% (95% CI -1.3% to 4.7%). After 400 microgram salbutamol this was +1.9% (95% CI -1.4% to 5.1%). A comparable efficacy was found for the Nebuchamber, the Aerochamber, and Volumatic with respect to the change in PEF after 100 and 400 microgram salbutamol.
This study showed no negative influence of ESC on plastic spacers with regard to clinical efficacy of a beta(2) agonist (salbutamol) in children with asthma. The metal Nebuchamber, plastic Aerochamber, and plastic Volumatic were equally effective.
使用压力定量吸入器(pMDI)和储雾罐进行吸入治疗常用于儿童气道疾病的治疗。多项实验室研究发现,塑料储雾罐上的静电荷(ESC)对气雾剂递送有明显负面影响。
研究塑料储雾罐上的静电荷是否会减弱对沙丁胺醇的支气管扩张反应。
90名4至8岁的哮喘儿童被随机分为三组:金属雾化器(Nebuchamber)组、塑料容积式储雾罐(Volumatic)组和塑料空气室储雾罐(Aerochamber)组。通过吸入100微克和400微克沙丁胺醇后呼气峰值流速(PEF)的变化来测量支气管扩张反应。在Volumatic组和Aerochamber组中,对带静电和不带静电的储雾罐进行了交叉比较。
我们发现,在Aerochamber组和Volumatic组中,静电荷对任何剂量沙丁胺醇的支气管扩张反应均无显著影响。对于塑料储雾罐,吸入100微克沙丁胺醇后,不带静电和带静电的储雾罐之间PEF变化的平均差异仅为+1.7%(95%可信区间为-1.3%至4.7%)。吸入400微克沙丁胺醇后,这一差异为+1.9%(95%可信区间为-1.4%至5.1%)。对于雾化器(Nebuchamber)组、空气室储雾罐(Aerochamber)组和容积式储雾罐(Volumatic)组,吸入100微克和400微克沙丁胺醇后PEF的变化具有相似的疗效。
本研究表明,静电荷对塑料储雾罐在哮喘儿童中β₂激动剂(沙丁胺醇)的临床疗效方面没有负面影响。金属雾化器(Nebuchamber)、塑料空气室储雾罐(Aerochamber)和塑料容积式储雾罐(Volumatic)同样有效。