Suppr超能文献

通过小容量金属储雾罐和大容量塑料储雾罐装置与开放式喷射雾化器相比,非氯氟烃沙丁胺醇的肺部给药。

Lung delivery of non-CFC salbutamol via small volume metal spacer and large volume plastic spacer devices compared with an open vent jet nebulizer.

作者信息

Lipworth B J, Clark D J

机构信息

Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Ninewells Hospital & Medical School, University of Dundee.

出版信息

Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1998 Feb;45(2):160-3. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2125.1998.00648.x.

Abstract

AIMS

To compare the lung delivery of salbutamol from a commonly used constant output open vent jet nebuliser (Sidestream) with use of both a conventional large volume plastic spacer (Volumatic) and a novel small volume metal spacer (NebuChamber). This was assessed using the early lung absorption profile of salbutamol over the first 20 min after inhalation.

METHODS

Twelve healthy volunteers were studied in a randomized single (investigator) blind crossover design. Single 1200 microg nominal doses salbutamol from a CFC-free metered-dose inhaler (12 sequential 100 microg puffs of Airomir) were delivered via the Volumatic and NebuChamber spacers. A single 1200 microg nominal dose of salbutamol was given as a 4 ml fill volume from a Sidestream nebuliser with mouthpiece. Mouth rinsing was performed after each drug sequence. Plasma salbutamol was measured at 5, 10, 15 and 20 min after the last dose of each inhalation sequence, with calculation of maximal concentration (Cmax) and average concentration over 20 min (C[av]). Systemic beta2-responses were measured as plasma potassium, tremor and heart rate.

RESULTS

Both the Volumatic and the NebuChamber spacers produced significantly greater salbutamol concentration than the Sidestream nebuliser. For C(av) this amounted to a 7.34-fold difference (95%CI 5.31 to 9.38) between Volumatic vs Sidestream, and a 7.04-fold difference (95%CI 4.91 to 9.17) for NebuChamber vs Sidestream. Similar differences were found for the extrapulmonary beta2-responses. There were no significant differences in either salbutamol concentration or extrapulmonary beta2-responses between the Volumatic and NebuChamber spacers.

CONCLUSIONS

We found that, in vivo, both the Volumatic and the NebuChamber spacers produced seven-fold greater lung delivery of salbutamol than the Sidestream nebuliser when comparing microgram equivalent nominal doses, in terms of the early lung absorption profile.

摘要

目的

比较使用传统大容量塑料储雾罐(Volumatic)和新型小容量金属储雾罐(NebuChamber)时,常用的恒量输出开放式喷射雾化器(旁流式)吸入沙丁胺醇后在肺内的递送情况。通过吸入后最初20分钟内沙丁胺醇的早期肺吸收情况进行评估。

方法

采用随机单(研究者)盲交叉设计对12名健康志愿者进行研究。通过Volumatic和NebuChamber储雾罐递送来自不含氟氯化碳的定量吸入器(12次连续100微克的Airomir喷雾)的单次1200微克标称剂量沙丁胺醇。使用带咬嘴的旁流式雾化器以4毫升填充量给予单次1200微克标称剂量的沙丁胺醇。每个药物给药顺序后进行漱口。在每次吸入顺序的最后一剂后5、10、15和20分钟测量血浆沙丁胺醇,计算最大浓度(Cmax)和20分钟内的平均浓度(C[av])。将全身β2反应测量为血浆钾、震颤和心率。

结果

Volumatic和NebuChamber储雾罐产生的沙丁胺醇浓度均显著高于旁流式雾化器。对于C(av),Volumatic与旁流式雾化器之间的差异为7.34倍(95%CI 5.31至9.38),NebuChamber与旁流式雾化器之间的差异为7.04倍(95%CI 4.91至9.17)。在肺外β2反应方面也发现了类似差异。Volumatic和NebuChamber储雾罐在沙丁胺醇浓度或肺外β2反应方面均无显著差异。

结论

我们发现,在体内,就早期肺吸收情况而言,当比较微克当量标称剂量时,Volumatic和NebuChamber储雾罐吸入沙丁胺醇后在肺内的递送量均比旁流式雾化器高7倍。

相似文献

2
Early lung absorption profile of non-CFC salbutamol via small and large volume plastic spacer devices.
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1998 Jul;46(1):45-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2125.1998.00041.x.
5
Drug delivery in asthma: a comparison of spacers with a jet nebuliser.
Aust N Z J Med. 1995 Aug;25(4):324-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-5994.1995.tb01897.x.
6
Comparative lung delivery of salbutamol given via Turbuhaler and Diskus dry powder inhaler devices.
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1997;53(1):47-9. doi: 10.1007/s002280050335.
10
Pharmacokinetics and systemic beta2-adrenoceptor-mediated responses to inhaled salbutamol.
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2001 Apr;51(4):359-62. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2125.2001.01362.x.

引用本文的文献

4
Pharmacokinetics and systemic beta2-adrenoceptor-mediated responses to inhaled salbutamol.
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2001 Apr;51(4):359-62. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2125.2001.01362.x.
5
Methods to identify drug deposition in the lungs following inhalation.
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2001 Apr;51(4):289-99. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2125.2001.01304.x.
6
Relative bioavailability of salbutamol to the lung following inhalation when administration is prolonged.
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2000 Sep;50(3):281-4. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2125.2000.00255.x.
7
Effect of electrostatic charge in plastic spacers on the lung delivery of HFA-salbutamol in children.
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1999 Mar;47(3):333-6. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2125.1999.00893.x.

本文引用的文献

4
Lung bioavailability of chlorofluorocarbon free, dry powder and chlorofluorocarbon containing formulations of salbutamol.
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1996 Mar;41(3):247-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1996.tb00191.x.
5
Lung bioavailability of generic and innovator salbutamol MDIs.
Thorax. 1996 Jun;51(6):658. doi: 10.1136/thx.51.6.658.
6
9
A comparison of commercial jet nebulizers.
Chest. 1994 Dec;106(6):1788-92. doi: 10.1378/chest.106.6.1788.
10
A non-electrostatic spacer for aerosol delivery.
Arch Dis Child. 1995 Sep;73(3):226-30. doi: 10.1136/adc.73.3.226.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验