Schweinberger S R, Stief V
University of Glasgow, Department of Psychology, 58 Hillhead Street, Glasgow G12 8QB, UK.
Neuropsychologia. 2001;39(4):420-9. doi: 10.1016/s0028-3932(00)00127-5.
Twelve patients with left-sided neglect, five patients with left-sided hemianopia, and 16 matched controls performed lexical decisions for foveally presented target words or pseudowords. Target words or pseudowords could be preceded by the same stimuli, presented for 150 ms as primes in either the left (LVF) or the right (RVF) visual hemifield. Primes in the RVF caused similar levels of priming across the three groups. In contrast, whereas primes in the affected LVF did not cause priming in hemianopic patients, patients with neglect showed highly significant priming from LVF primes, and the level of priming from these neglected primes was increased relative to normal control levels. This priming effect was attributed to lexical access, because no repetition priming was observed for pronounceable pseudowords. In striking contrast to the priming results, neglect patients' explicit recognition performance for these prime stimuli was at chance for the left hemifield, although it was near perfect for the right hemifield. This demonstrates that the observed priming effects in the left hemifield were indeed caused by stimuli that were not explicitly perceived.
12名患有左侧忽视症的患者、5名患有左侧偏盲的患者以及16名匹配的对照组人员,对中央凹呈现的目标单词或伪词进行词汇判断。目标单词或伪词之前可能会出现相同的刺激,作为启动刺激在左视野(LVF)或右视野(RVF)中呈现150毫秒。右视野中的启动刺激在三组中引起的启动水平相似。相比之下,虽然受影响的左视野中的启动刺激在偏盲患者中未引起启动,但忽视症患者显示出左视野启动刺激的高度显著启动,并且这些被忽视的启动刺激的启动水平相对于正常对照组水平有所增加。这种启动效应归因于词汇通达,因为对于可发音的伪词未观察到重复启动。与启动结果形成鲜明对比的是,忽视症患者对这些启动刺激的明确识别表现,左半视野的表现是随机的,尽管右半视野的表现近乎完美。这表明在左半视野中观察到的启动效应确实是由未被明确感知的刺激引起的。