Aubier M, Neukirch C, Peiffer C, Melac M
Service de Pneumologie-Unité INSERM U 408, H pital Bichat, Paris, France.
Allergy. 2001 Jan;56(1):35-42. doi: 10.1034/j.1398-9995.2001.00629.x.
Although H1 antihistamine compounds (H1) are highly effective in the treatment of allergic rhinitis (AR), their role in the treatment of asthma is still controversial. Because a strong association between AR and bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR) has been reported, this study was designed to assess the effect of a new H1 anti histamine, cetirizine (C), on nonspecific BHR in patients with AR. Twelve patients were included in a double-blind, crossover, placebo-controlled trial. All patients had positive skin tests for common allergens and showed BHR to inhaled methacholine after specific nasal allergenic challenge. After a washout period of 1 week to ensure the stability of the BHR, the patients received, by crossover randomization, C 10 mg daily or placebo (P) for 2 weeks. After each treatment period, BHR and nasal blocking index (NBI) were measured 1 and 6 h after nasal challenge. Bronchial responsiveness was expressed as methacholine PD20, the provocation dose of methacholine causing a 20% decrease in FEV1. Measurements were then performed after 2 weeks of C and after 2 weeks of P. Baseline values of PD20 (median) measured before challenge showed no difference after cetirizine or after placebo (1.36 mg). Results 1 h after allergen did not show significant differences between C (methacholine PD20=0.522 mg) and placebo (methacholine PD20=0.455 mg). By contrast, 6 h after challenge, methacholine PD20 was 0.918 mg for C and 0.483 mg for P (P=0.042). Similarly, NBI showed no change between C and P 1 h after challenge, whereas the difference was significant 6 h after challenge (P=0.011 ). These data demonstrate a protective nasal effect of C against BHR measured 6 h after nasal allergen challenge in patients with AR. They suggest that C may be useful in patients with asthma associated with AR.
尽管H1抗组胺化合物在治疗变应性鼻炎(AR)方面非常有效,但其在哮喘治疗中的作用仍存在争议。由于已有报道称AR与支气管高反应性(BHR)之间存在密切关联,本研究旨在评估一种新型H1抗组胺药西替利嗪(C)对AR患者非特异性BHR的影响。12名患者纳入一项双盲、交叉、安慰剂对照试验。所有患者对常见变应原皮肤试验呈阳性,且在特异性鼻变应原激发后对吸入的乙酰甲胆碱表现出BHR。经过1周的洗脱期以确保BHR的稳定性后,患者通过交叉随机分组,每日接受10 mg C或安慰剂(P)治疗2周。在每个治疗期后,在鼻激发后1小时和6小时测量BHR和鼻阻塞指数(NBI)。支气管反应性以乙酰甲胆碱PD20表示,即引起第一秒用力呼气容积(FEV1)下降20%的乙酰甲胆碱激发剂量。然后在C治疗2周后和P治疗2周后进行测量。激发前测量的PD20(中位数)基线值在西替利嗪治疗后或安慰剂治疗后无差异(1.36 mg)。变应原激发后1小时,C组(乙酰甲胆碱PD20 = 0.522 mg)和安慰剂组(乙酰甲胆碱PD20 = 0.455 mg)之间未显示出显著差异。相比之下,激发后6小时,C组的乙酰甲胆碱PD20为0.918 mg,P组为0.483 mg(P = 0.042)。同样,激发后1小时,C组和P组的NBI无变化,而激发后6小时差异显著(P = 0.011)。这些数据表明,在AR患者中,C对鼻激发后6小时测量的BHR具有保护作用。提示C可能对伴有AR的哮喘患者有用。