Suppr超能文献

一项比较长春瑞滨与长春瑞滨联合顺铂治疗复发性唾液腺恶性肿瘤患者的II期随机试验。

Phase II randomized trial comparing vinorelbine versus vinorelbine plus cisplatin in patients with recurrent salivary gland malignancies.

作者信息

Airoldi M, Pedani F, Succo G, Gabriele A M, Ragona R, Marchionatti S, Bumma C

机构信息

Department of Medical Oncology, San Giovanni Antica Sede Hospital, Via Cavour 31, 10123 Torino, Italy.

出版信息

Cancer. 2001 Feb 1;91(3):541-7. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(20010201)91:3<541::aid-cncr1032>3.0.co;2-y.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Some previous studies have shown that vinorelbine (VNB) is active in recurrent salivary gland tumors.

METHODS

Between April 1993 and April 1997, 36 patients in a Phase II randomized trial received either cisplatin, 80 mg/m(2), on Day 1 plus VNB, 25 mg/m(2), on Days 1 and 8 (every 3 weeks) (for a minimum of 3 cycles (Arm A [16 patients]), or VNB, 30 mg/m(2)/week, (for a minimum of 9 wks) (Arm B [20 patients]). There were 23 males and 13 females with a median age of 59 years (range, 20-74 years) and a median Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 1 (range, 0-2). Four patients had been treated with prior surgery (S) or radiotherapy (RT), 27 patients had been treated with S plus RT, and 5 patients had been treated with S plus RT plus mitoxantrone. Eighteen patients had major salivary gland tumors, and 18 patients had minor salivary gland tumors; 9 patients had adenocarcinoma, 22 patients had adenoid cystic carcinoma, 1 patient had a malignant mixed carcinoma, 3 patients had undifferentiated carcinoma, and 1 patient had a mucoepidermoid carcinoma. The site of recurrence was local in 16 patients, local plus metastatic in 5 patients, and metastatic only in 15 patients. These characteristics were well balanced between the 2 arms.

RESULTS

In Arms A and B a complete response (CR) was noted in 3 patients (19%) and no patients, respectively; a partial response (PR) was noted in 4 patients (25%) and 4 patients (20%), respectively; no change was noted in 6 patients (37.5%) and 9 patients (45%), respectively; and progressive disease was noted in 3 patients (19%) and 7 patients (35%), respectively. The median duration of the CR was 15+ months (range, 6-27+ months) and for PR the median duration was 7.5 months (range, 3-11+ months) and 6 months (range, 3-9 months) in Arms A and B, respectively. Number of patients surviving > 12 months was 6 versus 1 in Arms A and B, respectively (P < 0.05). Grade 2-3 nausea and emesis was statistically higher (P < 0.001) in Arm A; there was no significant difference with regard to other side-effects between the two treatment arms.

CONCLUSIONS

VNB is a drug with moderate activity in salivary gland malignancies. The combination of cisplatin plus VNB was found to be more active than VNB alone, with a good number of CRs and long-term survivors reported in the current study.

摘要

背景

先前的一些研究表明,长春瑞滨(VNB)对复发性涎腺肿瘤有活性。

方法

在1993年4月至1997年4月期间,36例患者参加了一项II期随机试验,其中一组(A组[16例患者])在第1天接受顺铂80mg/m²,在第1天和第8天接受VNB 25mg/m²(每3周一次)(至少3个周期);另一组(B组[20例患者])接受VNB 30mg/m²/周(至少9周)。患者共23例男性和13例女性,中位年龄59岁(范围20 - 74岁),东部肿瘤协作组体能状态中位值为1(范围0 - 2)。4例患者曾接受过手术(S)或放疗(RT),27例患者接受过S加RT,5例患者接受过S加RT加米托蒽醌。18例患者患有大涎腺肿瘤,18例患者患有小涎腺肿瘤;9例为腺癌,22例为腺样囊性癌,1例为恶性混合癌,3例为未分化癌,1例为黏液表皮样癌。复发部位为局部的有16例患者,局部加转移的有5例患者,仅转移的有15例患者。这些特征在两组之间平衡良好。

结果

A组和B组分别有3例患者(19%)和0例患者达到完全缓解(CR);分别有4例患者(25%)和4例患者(20%)达到部分缓解(PR);分别有6例患者(37.5%)和9例患者(45%)病情无变化;分别有3例患者(19%)和7例患者(35%)病情进展。A组CR的中位持续时间为15 +个月(范围6 - 27 +个月),PR的中位持续时间为7.5个月(范围3 - 11 +个月);B组PR的中位持续时间为6个月(范围3 - 9个月)。A组和B组存活超过12个月的患者数分别为6例和1例(P < 0.05)。A组2 - 3级恶心和呕吐在统计学上更高(P < 0.001);两组在其他副作用方面无显著差异。

结论

VNB是一种对涎腺恶性肿瘤有中度活性的药物。本研究发现顺铂加VNB的联合方案比单独使用VNB更有活性,报告了相当数量的CR和长期存活者。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验