Sanchez-Nieto B, Nahum A E, Dearnaley D P
Joint Department of Physics, Institute of Cancer Research and the Royal Marsden NHS Trust, Sutton, Surrey, UK.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2001 Feb 1;49(2):487-99. doi: 10.1016/s0360-3016(00)01508-x.
The aim of this paper is to illustrate the potential gain in tumor control probability (TCP) of prostate cancer patients by individualizing the prescription dose according to both normal-tissue (N-T) dose-volume and radiosensitivity data.
Two exercises have been carried out. Firstly, patients' dose prescriptions were individualised on the basis of N-T dose-volume histograms (DVHs) alone and secondly modeling potential differences in N-T sensitivity as well. In both cases, the change in tumor control that may be achieved by individualizing patients' dose was estimated assuming that after the dose adjustments, every patient had (1) the same value of normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) (5%) and (2) NTCP equal to the average NTCP before individualization (i.e., without increasing the average NTCP). The Lyman-Kutcher-Burman NTCP model was used to predict the N-T response curves with two different sets of parameters. The first exercise, based only on individual NT DVHs (i.e., assuming all patient equally radiosensitive), was over a real population of 50 prostate cancer patients. The second exercise modeled a 10,000-prostate-cancer patient population with varying NT dose-volume distributions and radiosensitivity (through allowing TD(50) to vary).
A gain of more than 9% in TCP was predicted when doses were individualized based only on DVHs so that every patient had 5% NTCP after dose adjustments. By adding the estimate of radiosensitivity, the gain increased to more than 15%. When the individualisation was performed without increasing the mean NTCP, then the potential gain in TCP was almost 5% (for adjustment based on DVH distribution solely) increasing to 7% with the additional consideration of radiosensitivity.
There is a potential gain (increase in local tumor control) from dose individualisation strategies based on both N-T dose-volume data and radiosensitivity (assuming that this is available). Dose prescription individualization based only on dose-volume data can be exploited provided that reliable N-T response models are available. There will be additional gains if some estimate of N-T radiosensitivity is available to allow further patient stratification, identification of patients with high radiosensitivity being particularly important.
本文旨在通过根据正常组织(N-T)剂量体积和放射敏感性数据个体化处方剂量,阐述前列腺癌患者肿瘤控制概率(TCP)的潜在提升。
进行了两项研究。首先,仅基于N-T剂量体积直方图(DVH)对患者的剂量处方进行个体化,其次还对N-T敏感性的潜在差异进行建模。在这两种情况下,假设剂量调整后每位患者(1)具有相同的正常组织并发症概率(NTCP)值(5%)以及(2)NTCP等于个体化前的平均NTCP(即不增加平均NTCP),估计通过个体化患者剂量可实现的肿瘤控制变化。使用Lyman-Kutcher-Burman NTCP模型,采用两组不同参数预测N-T反应曲线。第一项研究仅基于个体NT DVH(即假设所有患者放射敏感性相同),研究对象为50例前列腺癌患者的实际群体。第二项研究对10000例前列腺癌患者群体进行建模,这些患者具有不同的NT剂量体积分布和放射敏感性(通过允许TD(50)变化)。
当仅基于DVH个体化剂量,使每位患者在剂量调整后NTCP为5%时,预测TCP增益超过9%。通过加入放射敏感性估计,增益增加到超过15%。当个体化过程不增加平均NTCP时,TCP的潜在增益几乎为5%(仅基于DVH分布进行调整),在额外考虑放射敏感性时增加到7%。
基于N-T剂量体积数据和放射敏感性(假设可获得)的剂量个体化策略存在潜在增益(局部肿瘤控制增加)。如果有可靠的N-T反应模型,仅基于剂量体积数据的剂量处方个体化即可采用。如果能获得一些N-T放射敏感性估计以进一步对患者分层,将会有额外增益,识别高放射敏感性患者尤为重要。