• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

考虑肿瘤细胞密度和分级分布的前列腺癌放射治疗的个体化体素级剂量处方。

Patient-specific voxel-level dose prescription for prostate cancer radiotherapy considering tumor cell density and grade distribution.

机构信息

School of Physics, Mathematics and Computing, University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia, Australia.

Institute of Medical Physics, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia.

出版信息

Med Phys. 2023 Jun;50(6):3746-3761. doi: 10.1002/mp.16264. Epub 2023 Feb 15.

DOI:10.1002/mp.16264
PMID:36734620
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In prostate radiation therapy, recent studies have indicated a benefit in increasing the dose to intraprostatic lesions (IPL) compared with standard whole gland radiation therapy. Such approaches typically aim to deliver a target dose to the IPL(s) with no deliberate effort to modulate the dose within the IPL. Prostate cancers demonstrate intra-tumor heterogeneity and hence it is hypothesized that further gains in the optimal delivery of radiation therapy can be achieved through modulation of the dose distribution within the tumor. To account for tumor heterogeneity, biologically targeted radiation therapy (BiRT) aims to utilize a voxel-wise approach to IPL dose prescription by incorporating knowledge of the spatial distribution of tumor characteristics.

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to develop a workflow for generating voxel-wise optimal dose prescriptions that maximize patient tumor control probability (TCP), and evaluate the feasibility and benefits of applying this workflow on a cohort of 62 prostate cancer patients.

METHOD

The source data for this proof-of-concept study included high resolution histology images annotated with tumor location and grade. Image processing techniques were used to compute voxel-level cell density distribution maps. An absolute tumor cell distribution was calculated via linearly scaling according to published estimated tumor cell numbers. For the IPLs of each patient, optimal dose prescriptions were obtained via three alternative methods for redistribution of IPL boost doses according to maximization of TCP. The radiosensitivity uncertainties were considered using a truncated log-normally distributed linear radiosensitivity parameter ( ) and compared with Gleason pattern (GP) dependent radiosensitivity parameters that were derived based on previously published methods. An ensemble machine learning method was implemented to identify patient-specific features that predict the TCP improvement resulting from dose redistribution relative to a uniform dose distribution.

RESULTS

The Gleason pattern-dependent radiosensitivity parameters were calculated for 20 published prostate cancer ratios. Optimal voxel-level dose prescriptions were generated for all 62 PCa patients. For all dose redistribution scenarios, the optimal dose distribution always shows a higher (or equivalent) TCP level than the uniform dose distribution. The applied random forest regressor could predict patient-specific TCP improvement with low root mean square error (≤1.5%) by using total tumor number, volume of IPLs and the standard deviation of tumor cell number among all voxels.

CONCLUSION

Biologically-optimized redistribution of a boost dose can yield TCP improvement relative to a uniform-boost dose distribution. Patient-specific tumor characteristics can be used to predict the likelihood of benefit from a redistribution approach for the individual patient.

摘要

背景

在前列腺放射治疗中,最近的研究表明,与标准全腺放射治疗相比,增加前列腺内病变(intraprostatic lesions,IPL)的剂量有益处。此类方法通常旨在将目标剂量输送至 IPL 而无需刻意调节 IPL 内的剂量。前列腺癌表现出肿瘤内异质性,因此,人们假设通过调节肿瘤内的剂量分布,可以进一步提高放射治疗的最佳效果。为了考虑肿瘤异质性,生物靶向放射治疗(biologically targeted radiation therapy,BiRT)旨在通过结合肿瘤特征的空间分布知识,利用 IPL 剂量处方的体素方法。

目的

本研究的目的是开发一种生成体素优化剂量处方的工作流程,使患者的肿瘤控制概率(tumor control probability,TCP)最大化,并评估该工作流程在 62 例前列腺癌患者队列上的可行性和益处。

方法

本概念验证研究的原始数据包括高分辨率组织学图像,这些图像标记有肿瘤位置和分级。图像处理技术用于计算体素级别的细胞密度分布图。通过根据已发表的估计肿瘤细胞数量进行线性缩放,计算出绝对肿瘤细胞分布。对于每个患者的 IPL,通过根据 TCP 最大化的三种替代方法重新分配 IPL 增量剂量,获得最佳剂量处方。使用截断对数正态分布的线性放射敏感性参数( )考虑放射敏感性不确定性,并与根据以前发表的方法得出的基于 Gleason 模式(Gleason pattern,GP)的放射敏感性参数进行比较。实施了一个集成机器学习方法,以确定预测相对于均匀剂量分布的剂量重新分配导致 TCP 改善的患者特定特征。

结果

为 20 个已发表的前列腺癌 比计算了基于 GP 的放射敏感性参数。为所有 62 例 PCa 患者生成了最佳体素剂量处方。在所有剂量重新分配情况下,最优剂量分布始终显示出比均匀剂量分布更高(或等效)的 TCP 水平。应用随机森林回归器可以通过使用总肿瘤数量、IPL 体积和所有体素中肿瘤细胞数量的标准差,预测患者特异性 TCP 改善,其均方根误差(≤1.5%)较低。

结论

与均匀增量剂量分布相比,生物优化的增量剂量再分配可以提高 TCP。可以使用患者特定的肿瘤特征来预测个体患者从重新分配方法中获益的可能性。

相似文献

1
Patient-specific voxel-level dose prescription for prostate cancer radiotherapy considering tumor cell density and grade distribution.考虑肿瘤细胞密度和分级分布的前列腺癌放射治疗的个体化体素级剂量处方。
Med Phys. 2023 Jun;50(6):3746-3761. doi: 10.1002/mp.16264. Epub 2023 Feb 15.
2
Towards optimal heterogeneous prostate radiotherapy dose prescriptions based on patient-specific or population-based biological features.基于患者特异性或群体特异性生物学特征的最优异质前列腺放射治疗剂量处方。
Med Phys. 2024 May;51(5):3766-3781. doi: 10.1002/mp.16936. Epub 2024 Jan 15.
3
Treatment planning for prostate implants using magnetic-resonance spectroscopy imaging.利用磁共振波谱成像进行前列腺植入物的治疗计划
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2000 Jul 1;47(4):1085-96. doi: 10.1016/s0360-3016(00)00557-5.
4
Prostate cancer tumour control probability modelling for external beam radiotherapy based on multi-parametric MRI-GTV definition.基于多参数 MRI-GTV 定义的外照射放疗前列腺癌肿瘤控制概率建模。
Radiat Oncol. 2020 Oct 20;15(1):242. doi: 10.1186/s13014-020-01683-4.
5
Fitting tumor control probability models to biopsy outcome after three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy of prostate cancer: pitfalls in deducing radiobiologic parameters for tumors from clinical data.将肿瘤控制概率模型拟合至前列腺癌三维适形放射治疗后的活检结果:从临床数据推导肿瘤放射生物学参数的陷阱
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2001 Nov 15;51(4):1064-80. doi: 10.1016/s0360-3016(01)01731-x.
6
Robust dose-painting-by-numbers vs. nonselective dose escalation for non-small cell lung cancer patients.非小细胞肺癌患者的稳健剂量图与非选择性剂量递增。
Med Phys. 2021 Jun;48(6):3096-3108. doi: 10.1002/mp.14840. Epub 2021 May 14.
7
Robust treatment planning of dose painting for prostate cancer based on ADC-to-Gleason score mappings - what is the potential to increase the tumor control probability?基于 ADC 与 Gleason 评分映射的前列腺癌剂量雕刻治疗计划的稳健性——提高肿瘤控制概率的潜力如何?
Acta Oncol. 2021 Feb;60(2):199-206. doi: 10.1080/0284186X.2020.1817547. Epub 2020 Sep 17.
8
Voxel-level biological optimisation of prostate IMRT using patient-specific tumour location and clonogen density derived from mpMRI.利用从 mpMRI 获得的患者特定肿瘤位置和克隆源密度,对前列腺调强放疗进行体素级生物优化。
Radiat Oncol. 2020 Jul 13;15(1):172. doi: 10.1186/s13014-020-01568-6.
9
Dose painting of prostate cancer based on Gleason score correlations with apparent diffusion coefficients.基于与表观扩散系数相关性的前列腺癌剂量描绘。
Acta Oncol. 2018 May;57(5):574-581. doi: 10.1080/0284186X.2017.1415457. Epub 2017 Dec 20.
10
Prostate stereotactic ablative radiation therapy using volumetric modulated arc therapy to dominant intraprostatic lesions.应用容积旋转调强弧形放疗治疗前列腺内优势肿瘤病灶的前列腺立体定向消融放疗。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2014 Jun 1;89(2):406-15. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2014.01.042. Epub 2014 Mar 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Anatomical zone and tissue type impacts the repeatability of quantitative MRI parameters and radiomic features for longitudinal monitoring of treatment response in the prostate.解剖区域和组织类型会影响定量MRI参数及影像组学特征在前列腺治疗反应纵向监测中的可重复性。
MAGMA. 2025 Feb 22. doi: 10.1007/s10334-025-01231-9.
2
A review of whole gland prostate brachytherapy with focal dose escalation to intra-prostatic lesions: Clinical efficacy and technical aspects.对采用局部剂量递增至前列腺内病变的全腺体前列腺近距离放射治疗的综述:临床疗效和技术方面。
Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2024 Sep 16;32:100645. doi: 10.1016/j.phro.2024.100645. eCollection 2024 Oct.
3
Focal Boost in Prostate Cancer Radiotherapy: A Review of Planning Studies and Clinical Trials.
前列腺癌放疗中的局部剂量增强:计划研究与临床试验综述
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Oct 8;15(19):4888. doi: 10.3390/cancers15194888.