• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

赢得人心:运用心理学促进自愿器官捐赠

Winning hearts and minds: using psychology to promote voluntary organ donation.

作者信息

Farsides T

机构信息

School of Social Sciences, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK.

出版信息

Health Care Anal. 2000;8(2):101-21. doi: 10.1023/A:1009402628830.

DOI:10.1023/A:1009402628830
PMID:11183441
Abstract

Recent psychological research concerning determinants of and barriers to organ donation is reviewed with the intention of ascertaining acceptable and potentially effective ways of improving organ retrieval. On the basis of this review, five recommendations are made. (1) Individuals' donation wishes, where explicit, should be decisive. (2) Next of kin should witness donor decisions. (3) Mandated choice should replace voluntary 'opting-in'. (4) Initial donation choices should be repeatedly re-evaluated. (5) Those involved in organ procurement should distance themselves from model of bodies as machines or gardens and embrace models where bodies are viewed as sacred extensions of self. In combination, these recommendations are argued to be preferable in several ways to opt-out/presumed consent procurement options.

摘要

本文回顾了近期关于器官捐赠的决定因素和障碍的心理学研究,旨在确定可接受的、可能有效的改善器官获取的方法。基于此综述,提出了五项建议。(1)个人明确的捐赠意愿应具有决定性作用。(2)近亲应见证捐赠者的决定。(3)强制选择应取代自愿“选择加入”。(4)应反复重新评估最初的捐赠选择。(5)参与器官获取的人员应摒弃将身体视为机器或花园的模式,接受将身体视为自我神圣延伸的模式。综合来看,这些建议在几个方面比退出/推定同意获取方案更可取。

相似文献

1
Winning hearts and minds: using psychology to promote voluntary organ donation.赢得人心:运用心理学促进自愿器官捐赠
Health Care Anal. 2000;8(2):101-21. doi: 10.1023/A:1009402628830.
2
'If I donate my organs it's a gift, if you take them it's theft': a qualitative study of planned donor decisions under opt-out legislation.“如果我捐献器官,那是一份礼物;如果你们拿走,那就是盗窃”:一项关于默认捐献立法下计划捐献者决策的定性研究。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Nov 6;19(1):1463. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7774-1.
3
'It's like being conscripted, one volunteer is better than 10 pressed men': A qualitative study into the views of people who plan to opt-out of organ donation.“这就像被征召入伍一样,一个自愿者比 10 个被迫入伍的人要好”:对计划选择退出器官捐献的人的观点的定性研究。
Br J Health Psychol. 2020 May;25(2):257-274. doi: 10.1111/bjhp.12406. Epub 2020 Jan 30.
4
Comparing the effects of defaults in organ donation systems.比较器官捐赠系统中默认设置的效果。
Soc Sci Med. 2014 Apr;106:137-42. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.01.052. Epub 2014 Feb 4.
5
Organ donation attitudes and general self-efficacy: exploratory views from a rural primary care setting.器官捐赠态度与一般自我效能感:来自农村基层医疗环境的探索性观点。
Rural Remote Health. 2019 Oct;19(4):5241. doi: 10.22605/RRH5241. Epub 2019 Oct 30.
6
The authority of next-of-kin in explicit and presumed consent systems for deceased organ donation: an analysis of 54 nations.近亲在已故器官捐赠的明确同意和推定同意系统中的权限:对54个国家的分析。
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2012 Jun;27(6):2533-46. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfr619. Epub 2011 Nov 25.
7
The instability of organ donation decisions by next-of-kin and factors that predict it.亲属做出的器官捐赠决定的不稳定性及其预测因素。
Am J Transplant. 2008 Dec;8(12):2661-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2008.02429.x. Epub 2008 Oct 6.
8
The default option: Why a system of presumed consent may be effective at increasing rates of organ donation.默认选项:为何推定同意制度可能有效提高器官捐献率。
Psychol Health Med. 2014;19(5):580-5. doi: 10.1080/13548506.2013.841967. Epub 2013 Oct 1.
9
Consent and organ donation.同意与器官捐赠。
Rutgers Comput Technol Law J. 1985;11(2):559-88.
10
Consenting options for posthumous organ donation: presumed consent and incentives are not favored.死后器官捐献的同意选择:推定同意和激励措施不受青睐。
BMC Med Ethics. 2012 Nov 22;13:32. doi: 10.1186/1472-6939-13-32.

引用本文的文献

1
The role of the relatives in opt-in systems of postmortal organ procurement.亲属在死后器官获取的选择加入系统中的作用。
Med Health Care Philos. 2012 May;15(2):195-205. doi: 10.1007/s11019-011-9317-0.
2
Modified mandated choice for organ procurement.器官获取的改良强制选择
J Med Ethics. 2003 Jun;29(3):157-62. doi: 10.1136/jme.29.3.157.

本文引用的文献

1
Factors influencing decisions about donation of the brain for research purposes.影响为研究目的捐赠大脑决策的因素。
Age Ageing. 1998 Sep;27(5):623-9. doi: 10.1093/ageing/27.5.623.
2
An evaluation of the ethics of presumed consent and a proposal based on required response.对推定同意伦理的评估及基于要求回应的提议。
UNOS Update. 1994 Feb;10(2):16-21.
3
Consenting to donate organs: whose wishes carry the most weight?同意捐赠器官:谁的意愿最重要?
J Appl Soc Psychol. 1991 Jan;21(1):3-14. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1991.tb00438.x.
4
The foot-in-the-donor technique: initial request and organ donation.供体足部技术:初始请求与器官捐献
Basic Appl Soc Psych. 1984;5(1):75-81. doi: 10.1207/s15324834basp0501_5.
5
Cadaveric donotransplantation: nurses' attitudes, knowledge and behaviour.尸体供体移植:护士的态度、知识与行为。
Soc Sci Med. 2000 Feb;50(4):541-52. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(99)00325-1.
6
The public's willingness to discuss their preference for organ donation with family members.公众与家庭成员讨论其器官捐赠偏好的意愿。
Clin Transplant. 1999 Aug;13(4):342-8. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-0012.1999.130411.x.
7
The European Donor Hospital Education Programme (EDHEP): addressing the training needs of doctors and nurses who break bad news, care for the bereaved, and request donation.欧洲捐赠医院教育项目(EDHEP):满足那些传达坏消息、照顾逝者家属以及提出捐赠请求的医生和护士的培训需求。
Transpl Int. 1999;12(3):161-7. doi: 10.1007/s001470050205.
8
Two steps to three choices: a new approach to mandated choice.迈向三种选择的两步:强制选择的新方法。
Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 1999 Summer;8(3):340-7. doi: 10.1017/s0963180199803090.
9
Correlates of support for organ donation among three ethnic groups.三个种族群体中器官捐赠支持率的相关因素
Clin Transplant. 1999 Feb;13(1 Pt 1):45-50. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-0012.1999.t01-2-130107.x.
10
The influence of race on approaching families for organ donation and their decision to donate.种族对接触器官捐献家庭以及他们做出捐献决定的影响。
Am J Public Health. 1999 Feb;89(2):244-7. doi: 10.2105/ajph.89.2.244.