Suppr超能文献

多发性神经病的电诊断

Electrodiagnosis of polyneuropathy.

作者信息

Johnsen B, Fuglsang-Frederiksen A

机构信息

Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, University Hospital, Nørrebrogade HH, DK 8000, Aarhus, Denmark.

出版信息

Neurophysiol Clin. 2000 Dec;30(6):339-51. doi: 10.1016/s0987-7053(00)00237-9.

Abstract

Electrodiagnostic studies comprising electromyography (EMG) and nerve conduction studies (NCS) are well-established objective methods for the diagnosis, quantification and classification of polyneuropathies (PNP). This paper reviews examination techniques, their pathophysiological interpretation, examination strategies and diagnostic criteria for the diagnosis and classification of a PNP. The routine electrodiagnostic evaluation includes sensory NCSs performed with surface or needle electrodes, motor NCSs, F-wave studies and EMG by qualitative or quantitative techniques. Sensory NCSs and F-wave studies have a high sensitivity in PNPs and the different techniques complement each other. The distinction between a PNP with predominantly axonal loss and a PNP with predominantly demyelination is one of the major aims of the electrophysiological examination. There are, however, large variation in suggested criteria for predominantly demyelination. The degree of slowing in conduction taken to indicate demyelination varies between a decrease of 50 to 30% from mean of controls, distal latency prolongation criteria vary from 35% to 70% of mean of controls, F-wave latency prolongation criteria vary from 120% to 150% of upper limit of controls, and criteria for partial motor conduction block vary from 11 to 50% reduction of CMAP amplitude and/or area between proximal and distal stimulation. Needle EMG studies may be valuable in order to detect and quantify denervation activity, to assess chronicity by an evaluation of the extent of reinnervation, and to evaluate the topographical distribution of changes. It is concluded that electrodiagnostic studies are valuable in patients with suspected PNP and the results may have consequences for prognosis and therapy of individual patients. Large variation in examination techniques, strategies, interpretations and diagnostic criteria have been found among electromyographers and it is suggested that the value of electrodiagnostic studies may be further improved by international standardisation.

摘要

包括肌电图(EMG)和神经传导研究(NCS)在内的电诊断研究是用于多神经病(PNP)诊断、量化和分类的成熟客观方法。本文回顾了用于PNP诊断和分类的检查技术、其病理生理学解释、检查策略及诊断标准。常规电诊断评估包括使用表面电极或针电极进行的感觉NCS、运动NCS、F波研究以及采用定性或定量技术的EMG。感觉NCS和F波研究在PNP中具有较高的敏感性,且不同技术相互补充。区分以轴突丢失为主的PNP和以脱髓鞘为主的PNP是电生理检查的主要目标之一。然而,对于以脱髓鞘为主的建议标准存在很大差异。用于指示脱髓鞘的传导减慢程度在比对照平均值降低50%至30%之间变化,远端潜伏期延长标准在对照平均值的35%至70%之间变化,F波潜伏期延长标准在对照上限的120%至150%之间变化,部分运动传导阻滞标准在近端和远端刺激之间CMAP波幅和/或面积降低11%至50%之间变化。针电极EMG研究对于检测和量化失神经活动、通过评估再支配程度来评估慢性程度以及评估变化的地形分布可能很有价值。结论是,电诊断研究对于疑似PNP患者很有价值,其结果可能对个体患者的预后和治疗产生影响。在肌电图检查人员中发现检查技术、策略、解释和诊断标准存在很大差异,建议通过国际标准化进一步提高电诊断研究的价值。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验