Weiss S J, Ernst A A, Phillips J, Hill B
UC Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, California, USA.
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2001 Jan-Mar;5(1):19-22. doi: 10.1080/10903120190940263.
Understanding out-of-hospital transport demographics would clarify the opportunities for injury surveillance and prevention.
To test the hypotheses that there are demographic differences in home vs. non-home emergency medical services (EMS) scene transports and that among age groups there are differences in demographics.
Data were extracted from the EMS State Ambulance Transport database of all reported during 1995. Transports from patient homes were compared with transports from all non-home scenes. Data extracted included age, gender, race, and type of complaint. Subgroup analysis was performed based on age groups in nonvehicular cases, safety problems, and interpersonal violence. Results were compared using a two-tailed chi-square with significance at p<0.05. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were calculated for significant differences.
The study included 118,131 transported patients: 13% were children, 49% were adult between 18 and 64 years, and 38% were elder; 13% were African American, 82% were white, and 5% were other; 47% were male and 53% were female. Fifty-eight percent of the transports were for safety problems, and 17% were for interpersonal violence. Of the 118,131 transports, 56,812 (48%) were from patients' homes and 61,319 were not. Compared with EMS transports from non-home scenes, fewer home EMS transports were for injury (p<0.01, OR = 0.18, 95% CI = 0.17-0.19) and more home EMS transports were for illness (p<0.01, OR = 5.64, 95% CI = 5.49-5.79). There was no clinically significant difference in age, race, or gender. For all non-vehicular injury transports, the reason was more likely safety problems than interpersonal violence (58% vs. 17%); however, there was no difference in the percentages of type of call between the home and non-home transports. Home EMS transports were more likely interpersonal violence problems among adult patients less than 65 years old; however, among the old and young, the problems were more likely to be safety-related.
Forty-eight percent of all EMS transports are from the home. Only 18% of these EMS home transports are for injury-related problems. In general, EMS injury transports are more likely related to safety than to interpersonal violence. Among the home EMS transports, more than 50% of transports for young and old patients are safety-related. A large proportion of the home EMS transports for adults less than 65 years of age, however, are for interpersonal violence.
了解院外转运人口统计学特征有助于明确伤害监测和预防的机会。
检验以下假设,即家庭与非家庭紧急医疗服务(EMS)现场转运存在人口统计学差异,且不同年龄组在人口统计学方面也存在差异。
数据取自1995年期间报告的所有EMS州救护车转运数据库。将患者家中的转运情况与所有非家庭现场的转运情况进行比较。提取的数据包括年龄、性别、种族和主诉类型。基于非车辆病例、安全问题和人际暴力的年龄组进行亚组分析。使用双侧卡方检验比较结果,显著性水平为p<0.05。计算显著差异的比值比(OR)和95%置信区间(95%CI)。
该研究纳入了118,131名转运患者:13%为儿童,49%为18至64岁的成年人,38%为老年人;13%为非裔美国人,82%为白人,5%为其他种族;47%为男性,53%为女性。58%的转运是因为安全问题,17%是因为人际暴力。在118,131次转运中,56,812次(48%)来自患者家中,61,319次不是。与非家庭现场的EMS转运相比,家庭EMS转运中因伤害的比例更低(p<0.01,OR = 0.18,95%CI = 0.17 - 0.19),因疾病的比例更高(p<0.01,OR = 5.64,95%CI = 5.49 - 5.79)。在年龄、种族或性别方面没有临床显著差异。对于所有非车辆伤害转运,原因更可能是安全问题而非人际暴力(58%对17%);然而,家庭与非家庭转运之间的呼叫类型百分比没有差异。家庭EMS转运在65岁以下成年患者中更可能是人际暴力问题;然而,在老年人和年轻人中,问题更可能与安全相关。
所有EMS转运中有48%来自家庭。这些家庭EMS转运中只有18%是与伤害相关的问题。一般来说,EMS伤害转运更可能与安全相关而非人际暴力。在家庭EMS转运中,超过50%的老年和年轻患者转运与安全相关。然而,65岁以下成年人的家庭EMS转运中有很大一部分是因为人际暴力。