Chism S E, Keys H M, Gillin M T
Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med. 1975 Jan;123(1):84-90. doi: 10.2214/ajr.123.1.84.
The use of 3 dose assessment systems is compared. The Manchester approach which measures a dose to Point A and Point B; the Paris approach using rads and mgh; and Ellis's NSD approach appear to have equal value in predicting probability of pelvic control and the likelihood of complication over the dose range employed at this hospital. Control increases with higher dose schemes, but complications appear to be influenced by other variables not accounted for in the 3 systems.
对三种剂量评估系统的使用进行了比较。曼彻斯特方法测量A点和B点的剂量；巴黎方法使用拉德和毫克小时；埃利斯的名义标准剂量（NSD）方法在预测本院所采用剂量范围内盆腔控制的概率和并发症的可能性方面似乎具有同等价值。随着更高剂量方案的实施，控制效果会增强，但并发症似乎受到这三种系统未考虑的其他变量的影响。
