Holmqvist L W, von Koch L, de Pedro-Cuesta J
Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Occupational Therapy, and Elderly Care Research, Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge University Hospital, Sweden.
Scand J Rehabil Med. 2000 Dec;32(4):173-9. doi: 10.1080/003655000750060922.
We previously conducted a randomized controlled trial in which early supported discharge from the Department of Neurology at Huddinge Hospital in southwest Stockholm with continuity of rehabilitation at home (n = 41) was compared to routine rehabilitation services (n = 40) for moderately disabled selected stroke patients. No statistical significant differences were found in patient outcome at 3 or 6 months, but a moderately positive effect in the home rehabilitation group was suggested. In the present study we evaluated resource utilization of health and social care, impact on family caregivers during 6 months after acute stroke and patient satisfaction. A 50% reduction in total hospitalization (initial and recurrent) was observed, from 30 days in the routine rehabilitation group to 15 days in the home rehabilitation group (p < 0.001). After discharge, the mean number of home visits in the home rehabilitation group was 12. In total, the routine rehabilitation group had a higher frequency of therapy contacts and daycare in outpatient care. Seventy-eight percent received help from a family caregiver in activities of daily living, yet only 15% had formal home help service. No major differences were found in use of home help service or impact on family caregivers in the form of time devoted to helping the patient or subjective well-being of spouses as per Sickness Impact Profile. Patient satisfaction was in favour of the home rehabilitation group, but a significant difference was only found in active participation in rehabilitation programme planning. In conclusion, early supported discharge with continuity of rehabilitation at home, using goal-directed functional activities based on the patient's personal interests, should be the rehabilitation service of choice for moderately disabled stroke patients fulfilling certain criteria, provided that further evaluation during the first year after stroke reveals no great changes in outcome or resource use. More research into the effectiveness and cost implications of early supported discharge with continuity of rehabilitation at home is needed in other parts of Sweden and in other countries before it can be asserted that the conclusions drawn from this study are applicable elsewhere.
我们之前进行了一项随机对照试验,将斯德哥尔摩西南部胡丁厄医院神经内科对中度残疾的选定中风患者进行的早期支持出院并在家中持续康复(n = 41)与常规康复服务(n = 40)进行了比较。在3个月或6个月时,未发现患者结局有统计学显著差异,但提示在家康复组有中度积极效果。在本研究中,我们评估了健康和社会护理的资源利用、急性中风后6个月对家庭照顾者的影响以及患者满意度。观察到总住院时间(初次和再次住院)减少了50%,从常规康复组的30天降至在家康复组的15天(p < 0.001)。出院后,在家康复组的平均家访次数为12次。总体而言,常规康复组在门诊护理中的治疗接触和日托频率更高。78%的患者在日常生活活动中得到了家庭照顾者的帮助,但只有15%的患者获得了正规的居家帮助服务。根据疾病影响概况,在使用居家帮助服务或对家庭照顾者的影响方面,如帮助患者所花费的时间或配偶的主观幸福感,未发现重大差异。患者满意度倾向于在家康复组,但仅在积极参与康复计划规划方面发现了显著差异。总之,对于符合某些标准的中度残疾中风患者,早期支持出院并在家中持续康复,采用基于患者个人兴趣的目标导向功能活动,应是康复服务的首选,前提是中风后第一年的进一步评估显示结局或资源使用没有重大变化。在瑞典其他地区和其他国家,需要对早期支持出院并在家中持续康复的有效性和成本影响进行更多研究,才能断言本研究得出的结论适用于其他地方。