Kirk E P, Ashcraft M H
Department of Psychology, Cleveland State University, Ohio 44114-3696, USA.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2001 Jan;27(1):157-75.
The problem size effect in adult arithmetic performance is generally attributed to direct retrieval processes operating on a network representation in long-term memory. J. LeFevre and her colleagues (J. LeFevre, J. Bisanz, et al., 1996; J. LeFevre, G. S. Sadesky, & J. Bisanz, 1996) challenged this explanation using verbal report evidence that adults also use time consuming nonretrieval strategies to solve simple addition and multiplication. The authors replicated J. LeFevre and colleagues' methods, but added instructional biasing and silent control conditions to test these methods. Both reaction time and report results suggest that LeFevre and colleagues' conclusions about nonretrieval frequency may have been influenced by instructions that revealed the experimental hypothesis and affected participants' strategy reports. Obtaining evidence about adult strategy use in simple arithmetic will require understanding instructional demand and appropriate report methodology.
成人算术运算中的问题规模效应通常归因于对长期记忆中的网络表征进行操作的直接检索过程。J. 勒费夫尔及其同事(J. 勒费夫尔、J. 比萨兹等人,1996年;J. 勒费夫尔、G. S. 萨德斯基和J. 比萨兹,1996年)使用口头报告证据对这一解释提出了质疑,即成年人也会使用耗时的非检索策略来解决简单的加法和乘法运算。作者重复了J. 勒费夫尔及其同事的方法,但增加了教学偏向和无声控制条件来检验这些方法。反应时间和报告结果均表明,勒费夫尔及其同事关于非检索频率的结论可能受到了揭示实验假设并影响参与者策略报告的指示的影响。要获得有关成年人在简单算术中策略使用的证据,需要了解教学要求和适当的报告方法。