• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

归纳推理的属性。

Properties of inductive reasoning.

作者信息

Heit E

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Warwick, Coventry, England.

出版信息

Psychon Bull Rev. 2000 Dec;7(4):569-92. doi: 10.3758/bf03212996.

DOI:10.3758/bf03212996
PMID:11206199
Abstract

This paper reviews the main psychological phenomena of inductive reasoning, covering 25 years of experimental and model-based research, in particular addressing four questions. First, what makes a case or event generalizable to other cases? Second, what makes a set of cases generalizable? Third, what makes a property or predicate projectable? Fourth, how do psychological models of induction address these results? The key results in inductive reasoning are outlined, and several recent models, including a new Bayesian account, are evaluated with respect to these results. In addition, future directions for experimental and model-based work are proposed.

摘要

本文回顾了归纳推理的主要心理现象,涵盖了25年的实验研究和基于模型的研究,尤其探讨了四个问题。第一,是什么使得一个案例或事件能够推广到其他案例?第二,是什么使得一组案例能够推广?第三,是什么使得一种属性或谓词具有可投射性?第四,归纳推理的心理模型如何解释这些结果?文中概述了归纳推理的关键结果,并根据这些结果对包括一种新的贝叶斯理论在内的几种近期模型进行了评估。此外,还提出了实验研究和基于模型的研究的未来方向。

相似文献

1
Properties of inductive reasoning.归纳推理的属性。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2000 Dec;7(4):569-92. doi: 10.3758/bf03212996.
2
Inductive reasoning 2.0.归纳推理 2.0.
Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2018 May;9(3):e1459. doi: 10.1002/wcs.1459. Epub 2017 Dec 28.
3
New Paradigms in the Psychology of Reasoning.推理心理学的新范式。
Annu Rev Psychol. 2020 Jan 4;71:305-330. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-010419-051132. Epub 2019 Sep 12.
4
A dynamic model of reasoning and memory.一个推理与记忆的动态模型。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2016 Feb;145(2):155-180. doi: 10.1037/xge0000113.
5
Précis of bayesian rationality: The probabilistic approach to human reasoning.《贝叶斯理性:人类推理的概率方法》概要
Behav Brain Sci. 2009 Feb;32(1):69-84; discussion 85-120. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X09000284.
6
Theory-based Bayesian models of inductive learning and reasoning.基于理论的归纳学习与推理贝叶斯模型。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2006 Jul;10(7):309-18. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2006.05.009. Epub 2006 Jun 22.
7
The rationality of informal argumentation: a Bayesian approach to reasoning fallacies.非正式论证的合理性:一种用于推理谬误的贝叶斯方法。
Psychol Rev. 2007 Jul;114(3):704-32. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.114.3.704.
8
How do people learn from negative evidence? Non-monotonic generalizations and sampling assumptions in inductive reasoning.人们如何从负面证据中学习?归纳推理中的非单调概括和抽样假设。
Cogn Psychol. 2015 Sep;81:1-25. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2015.07.001. Epub 2015 Jul 24.
9
A Bayesian approach to the argument from ignorance.一种针对无知论证的贝叶斯方法。
Can J Exp Psychol. 2004 Jun;58(2):75-85. doi: 10.1037/h0085798.
10
Two kinds of reasoning.两种推理。
Psychol Sci. 2001 Mar;12(2):129-34. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.00322.

引用本文的文献

1
A realist perspective on optimizing community health workers' roles and functions to deliver integrated people-centred care.从现实主义视角优化社区卫生工作者的角色与职能,以提供以人为本的综合护理。
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2025 Sep 3;5(9):e0004926. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0004926. eCollection 2025.
2
Interpretable neural networks: principles and applications.可解释神经网络:原理与应用
Front Artif Intell. 2023 Oct 13;6:974295. doi: 10.3389/frai.2023.974295. eCollection 2023.
3
Perceived danger associated with a property modulates cross category generalization.

本文引用的文献

1
Expertise and category-based induction.专业知识与基于类别的归纳。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2000 Jul;26(4):811-28. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.26.4.811.
2
Induction with cross-classified categories.采用交叉分类类别进行归纳。
Mem Cognit. 1999 Nov;27(6):1024-41. doi: 10.3758/bf03201232.
3
Food for thought: cross-classification and category organization in a complex real-world domain.值得思考的问题:复杂现实世界领域中的交叉分类与类别组织
与某一属性相关的感知危险会调节跨类别泛化。
Cogn Neurodyn. 2022 Dec;16(6):1273-1281. doi: 10.1007/s11571-022-09793-3. Epub 2022 Mar 31.
4
Parental perspectives on the quality of life of children with Down syndrome.家长对唐氏综合征患儿生活质量的看法。
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Aug 12;13:957876. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.957876. eCollection 2022.
5
Team interventions in acute hospital contexts: protocol for the evaluation of an initial programme theory using realist methods.急性医院环境中的团队干预措施:运用现实主义方法评估初始项目理论的方案
HRB Open Res. 2021 Mar 29;4:32. doi: 10.12688/hrbopenres.13225.1. eCollection 2021.
6
Exposure to co-occurrence regularities in language drives semantic integration of new words.接触语言中的共现规律会促进新单词的语义整合。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2022 Jul;48(7):1064-1081. doi: 10.1037/xlm0001122. Epub 2022 Apr 7.
7
A Novel Framework for Understanding the Pattern Identification of Traditional Asian Medicine From the Machine Learning Perspective.从机器学习角度理解传统亚洲医学模式识别的新框架。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Feb 3;8:763533. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.763533. eCollection 2021.
8
A Theoretical Comprehensive Framework for the Process of Theories Formation.理论形成过程的理论综合框架
Comput Intell Neurosci. 2021 Nov 28;2021:5074913. doi: 10.1155/2021/5074913. eCollection 2021.
9
Premise typicality as feature inference decision-making in perceptual categories.前提典型性作为知觉范畴中特征推理决策的依据。
Mem Cognit. 2022 May;50(4):817-836. doi: 10.3758/s13421-021-01240-8. Epub 2021 Oct 8.
10
Opposites in Reasoning Processes: Do We Use Them More Than We Think, but Less Than We Could?推理过程中的对立面:我们使用它们的频率是否比我们想象的更高,但又比我们能够达到的频率更低?
Front Psychol. 2021 Aug 26;12:715696. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.715696. eCollection 2021.
Cogn Psychol. 1999 Jun;38(4):495-553. doi: 10.1006/cogp.1998.0712.
4
Studies in inductive inference in infancy.
Cogn Psychol. 1998 Oct;37(1):60-96. doi: 10.1006/cogp.1998.0691.
5
Categorical inference is not a tree: the myth of inheritance hierarchies.分类推理不是一棵树:继承层次结构的神话。
Cogn Psychol. 1998 Feb;35(1):1-33. doi: 10.1006/cogp.1997.0672.
6
Culture, category salience, and inductive reasoning.
Cognition. 1997 Dec;65(1):15-32. doi: 10.1016/s0010-0277(97)00034-6.
7
Setters and samoyeds: the emergence of subordinate level categories as a basis for inductive inference in preschool-age children.塞特犬和萨摩耶犬:从属层级类别在学龄前儿童归纳推理中的出现及作为归纳推理基础的情况
Dev Psychol. 1997 Nov;33(6):1074-90. doi: 10.1037//0012-1649.33.6.1074.
8
Does rank have its privilege? Inductive inferences within folkbiological taxonomies.等级有其特权吗?民间生物分类学中的归纳推理。
Cognition. 1997 Jul;64(1):73-112. doi: 10.1016/s0010-0277(97)00017-6.
9
Children's use of sample size and diversity information within basic-level categories.
J Exp Child Psychol. 1997 Feb;64(2):159-74. doi: 10.1006/jecp.1996.2344.
10
Categorization and reasoning among tree experts: do all roads lead to Rome?树木专家的分类与推理:条条大路通罗马?
Cogn Psychol. 1997 Feb;32(1):49-96. doi: 10.1006/cogp.1997.0645.