Waterer G W, Wunderink R G
Methodist Le Bonheur Healthcare, Memphis, TN 38104-2499, USA.
Respir Med. 2001 Jan;95(1):78-82. doi: 10.1053/rmed.2000.0977.
The value of blood cultures in community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) has been questioned. At issue is the potential for blood cultures to change management. We prospectively studied the yield and impact of blood cultures in patients admitted with CAP. Two hundred and nine subjects had at least two blood cultures prior to receiving antibiotics. The severity of CAP was graded using the Pneumonia Severity Index (PSI). Twenty-nine patients (13.9%) had a pathogen identified by blood culture. The yield of blood cultures increased with PSI grade (I--5.3%, II--10.2%, III--10.3%, IV--16.1%, V--26.7%), as did the likelihood of blood cultures changing antibiotic therapy (I to III--0%, IV--9.7%, V--20.0%). One hundred and seventy-nine (85.6%) patients received a quinolone, limiting the impact of pathogens resistant to beta-lactams. Four of 16 patients (25.0%) with a culture (blood or sputum)-guided change in antibiotic therapy died, compared to five of 31 patients (16.1%) who had an empiric change. Blood cultures are of minimal value in mild to moderate CAP, and should be limited to patients with PSI grade IV or V CAP unless a specific risk factor for pathogens resistant to the empiric therapy is present.
血培养在社区获得性肺炎(CAP)中的价值一直受到质疑。问题在于血培养改变治疗方案的可能性。我们前瞻性地研究了血培养在CAP住院患者中的阳性率及影响。209名受试者在接受抗生素治疗前至少进行了两次血培养。采用肺炎严重程度指数(PSI)对CAP的严重程度进行分级。29例患者(13.9%)血培养鉴定出病原体。血培养的阳性率随PSI分级增加(I级——5.3%,II级——10.2%,III级——10.3%,IV级——16.1%,V级——26.7%),血培养改变抗生素治疗的可能性也随之增加(I至III级——0%,IV级——9.7%,V级——20.0%)。179例(85.6%)患者接受了喹诺酮类药物治疗,限制了对β-内酰胺类耐药病原体的影响。在16例因培养(血培养或痰培养)结果而调整抗生素治疗的患者中,有4例(25.0%)死亡,相比之下,在31例经验性调整治疗的患者中有5例(16.1%)死亡。血培养在轻至中度CAP中的价值极小,应仅限于PSI分级为IV级或V级的CAP患者,除非存在对经验性治疗耐药病原体的特定危险因素。