• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

越短就总是越好吗?两份饮食问卷中问卷长度和认知易用性对回复率和数据质量的相对重要性。

Is shorter always better? Relative importance of questionnaire length and cognitive ease on response rates and data quality for two dietary questionnaires.

作者信息

Subar A F, Ziegler R G, Thompson F E, Johnson C C, Weissfeld J L, Reding D, Kavounis K H, Hayes R B

机构信息

Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD 20892-7344, USA.

出版信息

Am J Epidemiol. 2001 Feb 15;153(4):404-9. doi: 10.1093/aje/153.4.404.

DOI:10.1093/aje/153.4.404
PMID:11207159
Abstract

In this study, the authors sought to determine the effects of length and clarity on response rates and data quality for two food frequency questionnaires (FFQs): the newly developed 36-page Diet History Questionnaire (DHQ), designed to be cognitively easier for respondents, and a 16-page FFQ developed earlier for the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Trial. The PLCO Trial is a 23-year randomized controlled clinical trial begun in 1992. The sample for this substudy, which was conducted from January to April of 1998, consisted of 900 control and 450 screened PLCO participants aged 55-74 years. Controls received either the DHQ or the PLCO FFQ by mail. Screenees, who had previously completed the PLCO FFQ at baseline, were administered the DHQ. Among controls, the response rate for both FFQs was 82%. Average amounts of time needed by controls to complete the DHQ and the PLCO FFQ were 68 minutes and 39 minutes, respectively. Percentages of missing or uninterpretable responses were similar between instruments for questions on frequency of intake but were approximately 3 and 9 percentage points lower (p < or = 0.001) in the DHQ for questions on portion size and use of vitamin/mineral supplements, respectively. Among screenees, response rates for the DHQ and the PLCO FFQ were 84% and 89%, respectively, and analyses of questions on portion size and supplement use showed few differences. These data indicated that the shorter FFQ was not better from the perspective of response rate and data quality, and that clarity and ease of administration may compensate for questionnaire length.

摘要

在本研究中,作者试图确定问卷长度和清晰度对两种食物频率问卷(FFQ)的应答率和数据质量的影响。这两种问卷分别是:新开发的36页饮食史问卷(DHQ),其设计目的是让受访者在认知上更容易填写;以及先前为前列腺、肺、结肠和卵巢(PLCO)癌筛查试验开发的16页FFQ。PLCO试验是一项始于1992年的为期23年的随机对照临床试验。这项子研究于1998年1月至4月进行,样本包括900名对照者和450名年龄在55 - 74岁之间的PLCO筛查参与者。对照者通过邮件收到DHQ或PLCO FFQ。筛查者在基线时已完成PLCO FFQ,此次接受DHQ。在对照者中,两种FFQ的应答率均为82%。对照者完成DHQ和PLCO FFQ所需的平均时间分别为68分钟和39分钟。对于摄入频率问题,两种问卷中缺失或无法解释的回答百分比相似,但对于分量大小和维生素/矿物质补充剂使用问题,DHQ中的百分比分别低约3和9个百分点(p≤0.001)。在筛查者中,DHQ和PLCO FFQ的应答率分别为84%和89%,对分量大小和补充剂使用问题的分析显示差异不大。这些数据表明,从应答率和数据质量的角度来看,较短的FFQ并非更好,而且清晰度和易于填写可能会弥补问卷长度的不足。

相似文献

1
Is shorter always better? Relative importance of questionnaire length and cognitive ease on response rates and data quality for two dietary questionnaires.越短就总是越好吗?两份饮食问卷中问卷长度和认知易用性对回复率和数据质量的相对重要性。
Am J Epidemiol. 2001 Feb 15;153(4):404-9. doi: 10.1093/aje/153.4.404.
2
Comparative validation of the Block, Willett, and National Cancer Institute food frequency questionnaires : the Eating at America's Table Study.Block、Willett和美国国立癌症研究所食物频率问卷的比较验证:“在美国餐桌用餐”研究
Am J Epidemiol. 2001 Dec 15;154(12):1089-99. doi: 10.1093/aje/154.12.1089.
3
Administering a combination of online dietary assessment tools, the Automated Self-Administered 24-Hour Dietary Assessment Tool, and Diet History Questionnaire II, in a cohort of adults in Alberta's Tomorrow Project.在艾伯塔省明日计划的一个成年人队列中,管理在线饮食评估工具组合,包括自动自我管理 24 小时饮食评估工具和饮食史问卷 II。
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2021 Jul;121(7):1312-1326. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2021.01.014. Epub 2021 Feb 18.
4
Design characteristics of food frequency questionnaires in relation to their validity.食物频率问卷的设计特征与其效度的关系。
Am J Epidemiol. 2007 Dec 15;166(12):1468-78. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwm236. Epub 2007 Sep 18.
5
Diet quality of Montreal-area adults needs improvement: estimates from a self-administered food frequency questionnaire furnishing a dietary indicator score.蒙特利尔地区成年人的饮食质量有待改善:基于一份提供饮食指标分数的自填式食物频率问卷的评估
J Am Diet Assoc. 2005 Aug;105(8):1251-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2005.05.008.
6
Associations of race/ethnicity, education, and dietary intervention with the validity and reliability of a food frequency questionnaire: the Women's Health Trial Feasibility Study in Minority Populations.种族/族裔、教育程度及饮食干预与食物频率问卷的效度和信度之间的关联:少数族裔人群中的妇女健康试验可行性研究
Am J Epidemiol. 1997 Nov 15;146(10):856-69. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009203.
7
Vitamin K intake and prostate cancer risk in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian Cancer (PLCO) Screening Trial.维生素 K 摄入与前列腺癌风险:前列腺、肺、结直肠和卵巢癌(PLCO)筛查试验。
Am J Clin Nutr. 2019 Feb 1;109(2):392-401. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/nqy251.
8
Comparing methods for handling missing values in food-frequency questionnaires and proposing k nearest neighbours imputation: effects on dietary intake in the Norwegian Women and Cancer study (NOWAC).比较食物频率问卷中处理缺失值的方法并提出k近邻插补法:对挪威妇女与癌症研究(NOWAC)中饮食摄入量的影响
Public Health Nutr. 2008 Apr;11(4):361-70. doi: 10.1017/S1368980007000365. Epub 2007 Jul 2.
9
Using national dietary intake data to evaluate and adapt the US Diet History Questionnaire: the stepwise tailoring of an FFQ for Canadian use.利用国家膳食摄入数据评估和调整美国饮食史问卷:为加拿大使用而对食物频率问卷进行逐步定制。
Public Health Nutr. 2016 Dec;19(18):3247-3255. doi: 10.1017/S1368980016001506. Epub 2016 Jun 28.
10
Energy intake and risk of postmenopausal breast cancer: an expanded analysis in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial (PLCO) cohort.能量摄入与绝经后乳腺癌风险:前列腺癌、肺癌、结直肠癌和卵巢癌筛查试验(PLCO)队列中的扩展分析。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2009 Nov;18(11):2842-50. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-09-0087. Epub 2009 Oct 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Dietary intake and five types of mental disorders: a bidirectional Mendelian randomization study.饮食摄入与五种精神障碍:一项双向孟德尔随机化研究
BMC Psychiatry. 2025 Jul 4;25(1):594. doi: 10.1186/s12888-025-07100-y.
2
Influence of Food Security Status and Diet Quality on Maternal Gestational Weight Gain.粮食安全状况和饮食质量对孕妇孕期体重增加的影响。
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2024 May-Jun;69(3):394-402. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.13622. Epub 2024 Mar 29.
3
Methods to increase response to postal and electronic questionnaires.增加邮寄和电子问卷回复率的方法。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Nov 30;11(11):MR000008. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000008.pub5.
4
Vegetarian diets and risk of all-cause mortality in a population-based prospective study in the United States.基于人群的美国前瞻性研究中素食饮食与全因死亡率的关系。
J Health Popul Nutr. 2023 Nov 23;42(1):130. doi: 10.1186/s41043-023-00460-9.
5
Dairy product consumption and lung cancer risk: A prospective analysis.乳制品消费与肺癌风险:前瞻性分析。
Clin Nutr ESPEN. 2023 Oct;57:423-429. doi: 10.1016/j.clnesp.2023.06.040. Epub 2023 Jul 4.
6
Association between sulfur microbial diet and the risk of colorectal cancer precursors in older adults.老年人硫微生物饮食与结直肠癌前体风险之间的关联。
Front Nutr. 2023 Aug 14;10:1167372. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2023.1167372. eCollection 2023.
7
Dietary Quality and Circulating Lipidomic Profiles in 2 Cohorts of Middle-Aged and Older Male Finnish Smokers and American Populations.在 2 个队列的中年和老年芬兰吸烟者和美国人群中,饮食质量与循环脂质组学特征。
J Nutr. 2023 Aug;153(8):2389-2400. doi: 10.1016/j.tjnut.2023.06.010. Epub 2023 Jun 14.
8
A Systematic Review of Strategies to Enhance Response Rates and Representativeness of Patient Experience Surveys.系统评价增强患者体验调查应答率和代表性的策略。
Med Care. 2022 Dec 1;60(12):910-918. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001784. Epub 2022 Oct 19.
9
Developmental assets, creativity, thriving, and mental health among Malaysian emerging adults.马来西亚新兴成年人的发展资产、创造力、茁壮成长与心理健康
Front Psychol. 2022 Sep 6;13:944238. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.944238. eCollection 2022.
10
Inflammatory potential of diet and colorectal carcinogenesis: a prospective longitudinal cohort.饮食的炎症潜能与结直肠癌发生的关系:一项前瞻性纵向队列研究。
Br J Cancer. 2022 Jun;126(12):1735-1743. doi: 10.1038/s41416-022-01731-8. Epub 2022 Feb 8.