Guignard B, Coste C, Menigaux C, Chauvin M
Department of Anaesthesia, H pital Ambroise Pare, Boulogne-Billancourt, France.
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2001 Mar;45(3):308-14. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-6576.2001.045003308.x.
Bispectral index (BIS) monitoring has been found to decrease the requirements for propofol, sevoflurane and desflurane and to improve recovery. We wanted to assess the effect of BIS monitoring on intraoperative isoflurane utilisation, and the early recovery profile.
Eighty patients undergoing various surgical procedures were studied. In the first phase of the study, patients were anaesthetised without the use of BIS, the anaesthetists being blinded to the BIS readings, and isoflurane being administered according to standard clinical practice (control group). In a second phase, isoflurane was titrated to maintain a BIS value between 40 and 60 during surgery, and then 60-70 during 15 min prior to the end of surgery (BIS group). Isoflurane consumption was measured. Recovery times and the time to achieve a modified Aldrete score of 9 were recorded.
Despite similar mean BIS levels during maintenance of anaesthesia, the cumulative time spent with BIS values between 40 and 60 during maintenance of anaesthesia was significantly longer in the BIS group as compared with the control group (P<0.001). The isoflurane usage in the BIS group was 12-25% lower than in the control group (P<0.05). The time to awakening and extubation were comparable in the two groups. Although the patients were less sedated (P<0.01) during the three postoperative hours in the BIS (vs. control) group, no significant differences were observed in the time to obtain an Aldrete score of 9.
The addition of BIS to standard monitoring decreases isoflurane consumption. However, we found only a small advantage in using BIS with respect to recovery from isoflurane anaesthesia.
已发现脑电双频指数(BIS)监测可降低丙泊酚、七氟醚和地氟醚的用量,并改善恢复情况。我们旨在评估BIS监测对术中异氟醚使用及早期恢复情况的影响。
对80例接受各种外科手术的患者进行研究。在研究的第一阶段,患者在不使用BIS的情况下接受麻醉,麻醉医生对BIS读数不知情,异氟醚按照标准临床实践给药(对照组)。在第二阶段,术中滴定异氟醚以维持BIS值在40至60之间,然后在手术结束前15分钟维持在60至70之间(BIS组)。测量异氟醚消耗量。记录恢复时间及达到改良Aldrete评分为9的时间。
尽管麻醉维持期间两组平均BIS水平相似,但与对照组相比,BIS组麻醉维持期间BIS值在40至60之间的累计时间显著更长(P<0.001)。BIS组异氟醚用量比对照组低12 - 25%(P<0.05)。两组的苏醒和拔管时间相当。尽管BIS(与对照组相比)组患者术后三小时内镇静程度较低(P<0.01),但在达到Aldrete评分为9的时间上未观察到显著差异。
在标准监测中加入BIS可减少异氟醚消耗。然而,我们发现使用BIS在异氟醚麻醉恢复方面仅有微小优势。