Noll D R, Shores J H, Gamber R G, Herron K M, Swift J
Division of Medicine, Kirksville College of Osteopathic Medicine, 800 W Jefferson St, Kirksville, MO 63501, USA.
J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2000 Dec;100(12):776-82.
While osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT) is thought to be beneficial for patients with pneumonia, there have been few clinical trials--especially in the elderly. The authors' pilot study suggested that duration of intravenous antibiotic use and length of hospital stay were promising measures of outcome. Therefore, a larger randomized controlled study was conducted. Elderly patients hospitalized with acute pneumonia were recruited and randomly placed into two groups: 28 in the treatment group and 30 in the control group. The treatment group received a standardized OMT protocol, while the control group received a light touch protocol. There was no statistical difference between groups for age, sex, or simplified acute physiology scores. The treatment group had a significantly shorter duration of intravenous antibiotic treatment and a shorter hospital stay.
虽然整骨手法治疗(OMT)被认为对肺炎患者有益,但临床试验较少——尤其是在老年人中。作者的初步研究表明,静脉使用抗生素的持续时间和住院时间是很有前景的疗效衡量指标。因此,进行了一项更大规模的随机对照研究。招募了因急性肺炎住院的老年患者,并将他们随机分为两组:治疗组28人,对照组30人。治疗组接受标准化的OMT方案,而对照组接受轻触方案。两组在年龄、性别或简化急性生理学评分方面没有统计学差异。治疗组的静脉抗生素治疗持续时间明显更短,住院时间也更短。