Hermansen K, Madsbad S, Perrild H, Kristensen A, Axelsen M
Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark.
Diabetes Care. 2001 Feb;24(2):296-301. doi: 10.2337/diacare.24.2.296.
Insulin detemir (NN304) is a soluble basal insulin analog developed to cover basal insulin requirements. This trial aimed to compare the blood glucose-lowering effect of insulin detemir with that of NPH insulin (NPH) and to evaluate the two treatments with regard to intrasubject variation of fasting blood glucose, incidence of hypoglycemia, dose requirements, and safety.
This multicenter open randomized crossover trial in 59 type 1 diabetic subjects comprised a 2-week run-in period on a basal-bolus regimen with NPH insulin once daily, followed by two 6-week periods of optimized basal-bolus therapy with either once-daily insulin detemir or NPH insulin.
The area under the curve, in the time interval 23:00-8:00, derived from 24-h serum glucose profiles, was not statistically significantly different for the two treatment periods (insulin detemir:NPH ratio 89.2:83.5, P = 0.59). The intrasubject variation in fasting blood glucose during the last 4 days of treatment was lower for insulin detemir compared with NPH (P < 0.001). Mean dose requirements of insulin detemir were 2.35 times higher (95% CI 2.22-2.48) compared with NPH. During the last week of treatment, fewer subjects experienced hypoglycemic episodes on insulin detemir (60%) compared with NPH treatment (77%) (P = 0.049).
Insulin detemir was as effective as NPH in maintaining glycemic control when administered at a higher molar dose. The results indicate that insulin detemir may provide more predictable fasting blood glucose with lower intrasubject variation and reduced risk of hypoglycemia compared with NPH.
地特胰岛素(NN304)是一种可溶性基础胰岛素类似物,旨在满足基础胰岛素需求。本试验旨在比较地特胰岛素与中性鱼精蛋白锌胰岛素(NPH)的降血糖效果,并评估两种治疗方法在空腹血糖的个体内变异、低血糖发生率、剂量需求和安全性方面的情况。
这项针对59名1型糖尿病患者的多中心开放随机交叉试验,包括为期2周的导入期,采用每日一次NPH胰岛素的基础-餐时方案,随后是两个为期6周的优化基础-餐时治疗期,分别使用每日一次的地特胰岛素或NPH胰岛素。
从24小时血清葡萄糖谱得出的23:00 - 8:00时间间隔内的曲线下面积,两个治疗期之间无统计学显著差异(地特胰岛素与NPH的比值为89.2:83.5,P = 0.59)。与NPH相比,地特胰岛素治疗最后4天的空腹血糖个体内变异更低(P < 0.001)。地特胰岛素的平均剂量需求比NPH高2.35倍(95%可信区间2.22 - 2.48)。在治疗的最后一周,与NPH治疗(77%)相比,接受地特胰岛素治疗的受试者发生低血糖事件的较少(60%)(P = 0.049)。
当以更高的摩尔剂量给药时,地特胰岛素在维持血糖控制方面与NPH一样有效。结果表明,与NPH相比,地特胰岛素可能提供更可预测的空腹血糖,个体内变异更低,低血糖风险降低。