Heise Tim, Nosek Leszek, Rønn Birgitte Biilmann, Endahl Lars, Heinemann Lutz, Kapitza Christoph, Draeger Eberhard
Profil Institut für Stoffwechselforschung, Hellersbergstr. 9, D-41460 Neuss, Germany.
Diabetes. 2004 Jun;53(6):1614-20. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.53.6.1614.
The aim of this randomized double-blind study was to compare the within-subject variability of the glucose-lowering effect of a novel insulin analog, insulin detemir, with that of insulin glargine and NPH insulin in people with type 1 diabetes. Fifty-four subjects (32 males and 22 females, age 38 +/- 10 years [mean +/- SD], BMI 24 +/- 2 kg/m(2), HbA(1c) 7.5 +/- 1.2%, diabetes duration 18 +/- 9 years) participated in this parallel group comparison. Each subject received four single subcutaneous doses of 0.4 units/kg of either insulin detemir (n = 18), insulin glargine (n = 16), or human NPH insulin (n = 17) under euglycemic glucose clamp conditions (target blood glucose concentration 5.5 mmol/l) on four identical study days. The pharmacodynamic (glucose infusion rates [GIRs]) and pharmacokinetic (serum concentrations of insulin detemir, human insulin, and insulin glargine) properties of the basal insulin preparations were recorded for 24 h postdosing. Insulin detemir was associated with significantly less within-subject variability than both NPH insulin and insulin glargine, as assessed by the coefficient of variation (CV) for the pharmacodynamic end points studied [GIR-AUC((0-12 h)) 27% (detemir) vs. 59% (NPH) vs. 46% (glargine); GIR-AUC((0-24 h)) 27 vs. 68 vs. 48%; GIR(max) 23 vs. 46 vs. 36%; P < 0.001 for all comparisons]. Insulin detemir also provided less within-subject variability in the pharmacokinetic end points: maximal concentration (C(max)) 18 vs. 24 vs. 34%; INS-AUC((0- infinity )) 14 vs. 28 vs. 33%. The results suggest that insulin detemir has a significantly more predictable glucose-lowering effect than both NPH insulin and insulin glargine.
这项随机双盲研究的目的是比较新型胰岛素类似物地特胰岛素与甘精胰岛素和中性鱼精蛋白锌胰岛素(NPH胰岛素)在1型糖尿病患者中降血糖作用的个体内变异性。54名受试者(32名男性和22名女性,年龄38±10岁[均值±标准差],体重指数24±2kg/m²,糖化血红蛋白7.5±1.2%,糖尿病病程18±9年)参与了这项平行组比较。在四个相同的研究日,每位受试者在血糖正常钳夹条件下(目标血糖浓度5.5mmol/L)接受四剂0.4单位/千克的皮下注射,分别为地特胰岛素(n = 18)、甘精胰岛素(n = 16)或人NPH胰岛素(n = 17)。给药后24小时记录基础胰岛素制剂的药效学(葡萄糖输注速率[GIRs])和药代动力学(地特胰岛素、人胰岛素和甘精胰岛素的血清浓度)特性。通过所研究药效学终点的变异系数(CV)评估,地特胰岛素的个体内变异性显著低于NPH胰岛素和甘精胰岛素[GIR-AUC(0 - 12小时):地特胰岛素为27%,NPH胰岛素为59%,甘精胰岛素为46%;GIR-AUC(0 - 24小时):27% vs. 68% vs. 48%;GIR(max):23% vs. 46% vs. 36%;所有比较P < 0.001]。地特胰岛素在药代动力学终点的个体内变异性也较小:最大浓度(C(max))为18% vs. 24% vs. 34%;INS-AUC(0 - ∞)为14% vs. 28% vs. 33%。结果表明,地特胰岛素的降血糖作用比NPH胰岛素和甘精胰岛素更具可预测性。