• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

韩国道路交通事故严重程度的模式识别

Pattern recognition for road traffic accident severity in Korea.

作者信息

Sohn S Y, Shin H

机构信息

Department of Industrial Systems Engineering, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Ergonomics. 2001 Jan 15;44(1):107-17. doi: 10.1080/00140130120928.

DOI:10.1080/00140130120928
PMID:11214896
Abstract

An increasing number of road traffic accidents (RTA) in Korea has emerged as being harmful both for the economy and for safety. An accurately estimated classification model for several severity types of RTA as a function of related factors provides crucial information for the prevention of potential accidents. Here, three data-mining techniques (neural network, logistic regression, decision tree) are used to select a set of influential factors and to build up classification models for accident severity. The three approaches are then compared in terms of classification accuracy. The finding is that accuracy does not differ significantly for each model and that the protective device is the most important factor in the accident severity variation.

摘要

韩国道路交通事故(RTA)数量不断增加,已对经济和安全都造成危害。一个根据相关因素准确估计几种严重程度类型的RTA分类模型,可为预防潜在事故提供关键信息。在此,使用三种数据挖掘技术(神经网络、逻辑回归、决策树)来选择一组影响因素,并建立事故严重程度的分类模型。然后从分类准确性方面对这三种方法进行比较。研究结果是,每个模型的准确性没有显著差异,并且防护装置是事故严重程度变化中最重要的因素。

相似文献

1
Pattern recognition for road traffic accident severity in Korea.韩国道路交通事故严重程度的模式识别
Ergonomics. 2001 Jan 15;44(1):107-17. doi: 10.1080/00140130120928.
2
Analysis of traffic injury severity: an application of non-parametric classification tree techniques.交通伤严重程度分析:非参数分类树技术的应用
Accid Anal Prev. 2006 Sep;38(5):1019-27. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2006.04.009. Epub 2006 Jun 2.
3
Multiple-vehicle traffic accidents in Hong Kong.香港的多车交通事故。
Accid Anal Prev. 2006 Nov;38(6):1157-61. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2006.05.002. Epub 2006 Jun 14.
4
Analysis of traffic accident size for Korean highway using structural equation models.运用结构方程模型分析韩国高速公路交通事故规模
Accid Anal Prev. 2008 Nov;40(6):1955-63. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2008.08.006. Epub 2008 Sep 2.
5
Extracting decision rules from police accident reports through decision trees.通过决策树从警察事故报告中提取决策规则。
Accid Anal Prev. 2013 Jan;50:1151-60. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2012.09.006. Epub 2012 Sep 25.
6
Explorative spatial analysis of traffic accident statistics and road mortality among the provinces of Turkey.土耳其各省交通事故统计和道路死亡率的探索性空间分析。
J Safety Res. 2009 Oct;40(5):341-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2009.07.006. Epub 2009 Sep 19.
7
Underreporting in traffic accident data, bias in parameters and the structure of injury severity models.交通事故数据中的漏报、参数偏差以及损伤严重程度模型的结构
Accid Anal Prev. 2008 Jul;40(4):1320-9. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2007.10.016. Epub 2008 Mar 5.
8
Development of an accident duration prediction model on the Korean Freeway Systems.开发韩国高速公路系统事故持续时间预测模型。
Accid Anal Prev. 2010 Jan;42(1):282-9. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2009.08.005. Epub 2009 Aug 28.
9
Road traffic accidents and policy interventions in Korea.韩国的道路交通事故与政策干预措施
Inj Control Saf Promot. 2003 Mar-Jun;10(1-2):89-94. doi: 10.1076/icsp.10.1.89.14120.
10
Network-level accident-mapping: Distance based pattern matching using artificial neural network.网络级事故映射:基于人工神经网络的距离模式匹配。
Accid Anal Prev. 2014 Apr;65:105-13. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2013.12.001. Epub 2013 Dec 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Scenario-Mining for Level 4 Automated Vehicle Safety Assessment from Real Accident Situations in Urban Areas Using a Natural Language Process.基于自然语言处理的城市真实事故场景下 4 级自动驾驶汽车安全评估的情景挖掘
Sensors (Basel). 2021 Oct 19;21(20):6929. doi: 10.3390/s21206929.
2
Traffic Crash Severity Prediction-A Synergy by Hybrid Principal Component Analysis and Machine Learning Models.交通事故严重程度预测——混合主成分分析与机器学习模型的协同作用
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Oct 19;17(20):7598. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17207598.
3
Predicting Crash Injury Severity with Machine Learning Algorithm Synergized with Clustering Technique: A Promising Protocol.
运用机器学习算法与聚类技术协同预测碰撞伤害严重程度:一项有前景的方案。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jul 30;17(15):5497. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17155497.
4
Hazardous Traffic Event Detection Using Markov Blanket and Sequential Minimal Optimization (MB-SMO).基于马尔可夫毯和序列最小优化(MB-SMO)的危险交通事件检测
Sensors (Basel). 2016 Jul 13;16(7):1084. doi: 10.3390/s16071084.
5
GEOGRAPIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS IN DETERMINING ROAD TRAFFIC CRASH ANALYSIS IN IBADAN, NIGERIA.地理信息系统在尼日利亚伊巴丹道路交通事故分析中的应用
J West Afr Coll Surg. 2014 Jul-Sep;4(3):20-34.
6
Analysis of factors associated with traffic injury severity on rural roads in Iran.伊朗农村道路交通事故伤害严重程度相关因素分析。
J Inj Violence Res. 2012 Jan;4(1):36-41. doi: 10.5249/jivr.v4i1.67. Epub 2011 Apr 16.