• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

交通事故严重程度预测——混合主成分分析与机器学习模型的协同作用

Traffic Crash Severity Prediction-A Synergy by Hybrid Principal Component Analysis and Machine Learning Models.

作者信息

Assi Khaled

机构信息

Civil & Environmental Engineering Department, King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals, Dhahran 31261, Saudi Arabia.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Oct 19;17(20):7598. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17207598.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph17207598
PMID:33086567
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7589286/
Abstract

The accurate prediction of road traffic crash (RTC) severity contributes to generating crucial information, which can be used to adopt appropriate measures to reduce the aftermath of crashes. This study aims to develop a hybrid system using principal component analysis (PCA) with multilayer perceptron neural networks (MLP-NN) and support vector machines (SVM) in predicting RTC severity. PCA shows that the first nine components have an eigenvalue greater than one. The cumulative variance percentage explained by these principal components was found to be 67%. The prediction accuracies of the models developed using the original attributes were compared with those of the models developed using principal components. It was found that the testing accuracies of MLP-NN and SVM increased from 64.50% and 62.70% to 82.70% and 80.70%, respectively, after using principal components. The proposed models would be beneficial to trauma centers in predicting crash severity with high accuracy so that they would be able to prepare for appropriate and prompt medical treatment.

摘要

准确预测道路交通事故(RTC)的严重程度有助于生成关键信息,这些信息可用于采取适当措施以减少事故后果。本研究旨在开发一种混合系统,该系统使用主成分分析(PCA)与多层感知器神经网络(MLP-NN)和支持向量机(SVM)来预测RTC严重程度。主成分分析表明,前九个成分的特征值大于1。发现这些主成分解释的累积方差百分比为67%。将使用原始属性开发的模型的预测准确性与使用主成分开发的模型的预测准确性进行了比较。结果发现,使用主成分后,MLP-NN和SVM的测试准确率分别从64.50%和62.70%提高到了82.70%和80.70%。所提出的模型将有助于创伤中心高精度地预测事故严重程度,以便它们能够为适当和及时的医疗治疗做好准备。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf98/7589286/6d6bf0333209/ijerph-17-07598-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf98/7589286/37bccf4031f5/ijerph-17-07598-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf98/7589286/01b96cce3094/ijerph-17-07598-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf98/7589286/0503008311d5/ijerph-17-07598-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf98/7589286/4c88f3cfb9f8/ijerph-17-07598-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf98/7589286/7f807625bcd0/ijerph-17-07598-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf98/7589286/9edb2bd37d05/ijerph-17-07598-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf98/7589286/603de4dc1ccb/ijerph-17-07598-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf98/7589286/7c6fbc3d9474/ijerph-17-07598-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf98/7589286/3c63ffdbc585/ijerph-17-07598-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf98/7589286/6d6bf0333209/ijerph-17-07598-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf98/7589286/37bccf4031f5/ijerph-17-07598-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf98/7589286/01b96cce3094/ijerph-17-07598-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf98/7589286/0503008311d5/ijerph-17-07598-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf98/7589286/4c88f3cfb9f8/ijerph-17-07598-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf98/7589286/7f807625bcd0/ijerph-17-07598-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf98/7589286/9edb2bd37d05/ijerph-17-07598-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf98/7589286/603de4dc1ccb/ijerph-17-07598-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf98/7589286/7c6fbc3d9474/ijerph-17-07598-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf98/7589286/3c63ffdbc585/ijerph-17-07598-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf98/7589286/6d6bf0333209/ijerph-17-07598-g010.jpg

相似文献

1
Traffic Crash Severity Prediction-A Synergy by Hybrid Principal Component Analysis and Machine Learning Models.交通事故严重程度预测——混合主成分分析与机器学习模型的协同作用
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Oct 19;17(20):7598. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17207598.
2
Predicting Crash Injury Severity with Machine Learning Algorithm Synergized with Clustering Technique: A Promising Protocol.运用机器学习算法与聚类技术协同预测碰撞伤害严重程度:一项有前景的方案。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jul 30;17(15):5497. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17155497.
3
Class-imbalanced crash prediction based on real-time traffic and weather data: A driving simulator study.基于实时交通和天气数据的不平衡碰撞预测:驾驶模拟器研究。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2020;21(3):201-208. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2020.1723794. Epub 2020 Mar 3.
4
Spatial and temporal prediction of secondary crashes combining stacked sparse auto-encoder and long short-term memory.基于堆叠稀疏自编码器和长短时记忆模型的二次事故时空预测
Accid Anal Prev. 2023 Oct;191:107205. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2023.107205. Epub 2023 Jul 4.
5
Integrating machine learning into path analysis for quantifying behavioral pathways in bicycle-motor vehicle crashes.将机器学习整合到路径分析中,以量化自行车-机动车碰撞中的行为途径。
Accid Anal Prev. 2022 Apr;168:106622. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2022.106622. Epub 2022 Feb 26.
6
Comparison of four statistical and machine learning methods for crash severity prediction.四种用于碰撞严重程度预测的统计和机器学习方法的比较
Accid Anal Prev. 2017 Nov;108:27-36. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2017.08.008. Epub 2017 Sep 6.
7
Severity analysis of road transport accidents of hazardous materials with machine learning.基于机器学习的危险物品道路运输事故严重性分析。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2021;22(4):324-329. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2021.1900569. Epub 2021 Apr 13.
8
Efficient mapping of crash risk at intersections with connected vehicle data and deep learning models.利用车联网数据和深度学习模型实现交叉口碰撞风险的高效映射。
Accid Anal Prev. 2020 Sep;144:105665. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2020.105665. Epub 2020 Jul 16.
9
Interpretable machine learning for evaluating risk factors of freeway crash severity.用于评估高速公路碰撞严重程度风险因素的可解释机器学习。
Int J Inj Contr Saf Promot. 2024 Sep;31(3):534-550. doi: 10.1080/17457300.2024.2351972. Epub 2024 May 20.
10
Crash prediction based on traffic platoon characteristics using floating car trajectory data and the machine learning approach.基于浮动车轨迹数据和机器学习方法的交通车队特征的碰撞预测。
Accid Anal Prev. 2019 Dec;133:105320. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2019.105320. Epub 2019 Oct 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Brain analysis to approach human muscles synergy using deep learning.利用深度学习进行大脑分析以探究人类肌肉协同作用。
Cogn Neurodyn. 2025 Dec;19(1):44. doi: 10.1007/s11571-025-10228-y. Epub 2025 Feb 22.
2
Classification of truck-involved crash severity: Dealing with missing, imbalanced, and high dimensional safety data.卡车事故严重程度分类:处理缺失、不平衡和高维安全数据。
PLoS One. 2023 Mar 22;18(3):e0281901. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0281901. eCollection 2023.
3
Human injury-based safety decision of automated vehicles.基于人类伤害的自动驾驶汽车安全决策。

本文引用的文献

1
Software Requirements Classification Using Machine Learning Algorithms.使用机器学习算法进行软件需求分类
Entropy (Basel). 2020 Sep 21;22(9):1057. doi: 10.3390/e22091057.
2
Predicting Crash Injury Severity with Machine Learning Algorithm Synergized with Clustering Technique: A Promising Protocol.运用机器学习算法与聚类技术协同预测碰撞伤害严重程度:一项有前景的方案。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jul 30;17(15):5497. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17155497.
3
Comparison of four statistical and machine learning methods for crash severity prediction.
iScience. 2022 Jun 30;25(8):104703. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2022.104703. eCollection 2022 Aug 19.
4
Comparison of Prediction Models for Mortality Related to Injuries from Road Traffic Accidents after Correcting for Undersampling.校正欠抽样后道路交通事故伤害相关死亡率预测模型的比较
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 May 24;18(11):5604. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18115604.
四种用于碰撞严重程度预测的统计和机器学习方法的比较
Accid Anal Prev. 2017 Nov;108:27-36. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2017.08.008. Epub 2017 Sep 6.
4
A hybrid clustering and classification approach for predicting crash injury severity on rural roads.一种用于预测农村道路碰撞伤害严重程度的混合聚类与分类方法。
Int J Inj Contr Saf Promot. 2018 Mar;25(1):85-101. doi: 10.1080/17457300.2017.1341933. Epub 2017 Jul 10.
5
Analysis of factors affecting the severity of crashes in urban road intersections.城市道路交叉口碰撞事故严重程度的影响因素分析。
Accid Anal Prev. 2017 Jun;103:112-122. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2017.04.007. Epub 2017 Apr 19.
6
Design and Application of a Variable Selection Method for Multilayer Perceptron Neural Network With LASSO.基于 LASSO 的多层感知机神经网络变量选择方法的设计与应用。
IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst. 2017 Jun;28(6):1386-1396. doi: 10.1109/TNNLS.2016.2542866. Epub 2016 Mar 30.
7
A stable and optimized neural network model for crash injury severity prediction.用于事故伤害严重程度预测的稳定且优化的神经网络模型。
Accid Anal Prev. 2014 Dec;73:351-8. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2014.09.006. Epub 2014 Sep 29.
8
Using support vector machine models for crash injury severity analysis.应用支持向量机模型进行事故伤害严重程度分析。
Accid Anal Prev. 2012 Mar;45:478-86. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2011.08.016. Epub 2011 Sep 21.
9
Analysis of traffic accident injury severity on Spanish rural highways using Bayesian networks.基于贝叶斯网络的西班牙农村公路交通事故伤害严重程度分析。
Accid Anal Prev. 2011 Jan;43(1):402-11. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2010.09.010. Epub 2010 Oct 20.
10
Analysis of traffic injury severity: an application of non-parametric classification tree techniques.交通伤严重程度分析:非参数分类树技术的应用
Accid Anal Prev. 2006 Sep;38(5):1019-27. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2006.04.009. Epub 2006 Jun 2.