Duff S C, Logie R H
Institute for Psychosocial Science, University of Bergen, Norway.
Q J Exp Psychol A. 2001 Feb;54(1):31-48. doi: 10.1080/02724980042000011.
Two experiments are reported that address theoretical assumptions as to the nature of working memory involved in working memory span tasks (Daneman & Carpenter, 1980). Experiment 1 used a version of the sentence span task, and Experiment 2 combined arithmetic verification with recall of presented words. In each experiment, working memory processing span was assessed independently of temporary storage span prior to their combination. Combined task performance under high demand for each component resulted in substantial residual performance for both task elements, particularly in Experiment 2. The results do not challenge the utility of the sentence span task as a measure of on-line cognition, but they raise concerns as to how resource might be allocated to processing and storage elements of the task within a single flexible resource pool, or between different resources of a multiple component working memory system. Although both models lack predictive power regarding resource allocation in these tasks, the multiple resource model appears to offer the better account.
本文报告了两项实验,这些实验探讨了关于工作记忆广度任务中所涉及工作记忆本质的理论假设(丹曼和卡彭特,1980)。实验1使用了句子广度任务的一个版本,实验2将算术验证与呈现单词的回忆相结合。在每个实验中,工作记忆处理广度在与临时存储广度结合之前被独立评估。在对每个组件有高要求的情况下,组合任务的表现使得两个任务元素都有显著的剩余表现,尤其是在实验2中。这些结果并不质疑句子广度任务作为在线认知测量方法的效用,但它们引发了人们对于如何在单一灵活资源池内,或者在多组件工作记忆系统的不同资源之间,将资源分配给任务的处理和存储元素的担忧。尽管这两种模型在这些任务的资源分配方面都缺乏预测能力,但多资源模型似乎能提供更好的解释。