King R N, Koehler D J
Department of Psychology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario N2L 3G1, Canada.
J Exp Psychol Appl. 2000 Dec;6(4):336-48. doi: 10.1037//1076-898x.6.4.336.
The authors investigate the illusory correlation phenomenon as a possible contributor to the persistence of graphology's use to predict personality. Participants unfamiliar with graphology inspected handwriting samples paired with fabricated personality profiles. In Experiment 1, handwriting samples and personality profiles were randomly paired. In Experiment 2, discernible correlations near unity were set between targeted handwriting-feature-personality-trait pairs in a congruent or incongruent direction with graphologists' claims. In both experiments, participants' judgments of the correlation between designated handwriting-feature-personality-trait pairs agreed with graphologists' claims, even after controlling for their actual statistical association. Semantic association between words used to describe handwriting features and personality traits was the source of biases in perceived correlation. Results may partially account for continued use of graphology despite overwhelming evidence against its predictive validity.
作者研究了错觉关联现象,认为这可能是笔迹学持续被用于预测性格的一个原因。不熟悉笔迹学的参与者检查了与伪造的性格简介配对的笔迹样本。在实验1中,笔迹样本和性格简介是随机配对的。在实验2中,在目标笔迹特征与性格特质对之间设定了接近统一的可辨别相关性,其方向与笔迹学家的主张一致或不一致。在两个实验中,参与者对指定的笔迹特征与性格特质对之间相关性的判断都与笔迹学家的主张一致,即使在控制了它们实际的统计关联之后也是如此。用于描述笔迹特征和性格特质的词语之间的语义关联是感知相关性偏差的来源。尽管有大量证据表明笔迹学缺乏预测效度,但这些结果可能部分解释了笔迹学为何仍在持续使用。