Suppr超能文献

令人满意的事件中令人满意的是什么?对10种候选心理需求进行测试。

What is satisfying about satisfying events? Testing 10 candidate psychological needs.

作者信息

Sheldon K M, Elliot A J, Kim Y, Kasser T

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Missouri-Columbia, 65211, USA.

出版信息

J Pers Soc Psychol. 2001 Feb;80(2):325-39. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.80.2.325.

Abstract

Three studies compared 10 candidate psychological needs in an attempt to determine which are truly most fundamental for humans. Participants described "most satisfying events" within their lives and then rated the salience of each of the 10 candidate needs within these events. Supporting self-determination theory postulates (Ryan & Deci, 2000)--autonomy, competence, and relatedness, were consistently among the top 4 needs, in terms of both their salience and their association with event-related affect. Self-esteem was also important, whereas self-actualization or meaning, physical thriving, popularity or influence, and money-luxury were less important. This basic pattern emerged within three different time frames and within both U.S. and South Korean samples and also within a final study that asked, "What's unsatisfying about unsatisfying events?" Implications for hierarchical theories of needs are discussed.

摘要

三项研究对10种候选心理需求进行了比较,试图确定哪些需求对人类来说真正最为根本。参与者描述了他们生活中“最令人满足的事件”,然后对这10种候选需求在这些事件中的突出程度进行评分。支持自我决定理论的假设(瑞安和德西,2000年)——自主性、能力和关联性,在突出程度以及与事件相关情感的关联方面,始终位列前4种需求之中。自尊也很重要,而自我实现或意义、身体安康、受欢迎程度或影响力以及金钱-奢侈品则不太重要。这一基本模式在三个不同的时间框架内、在美国和韩国的样本中均有出现,并且在最后一项研究中也出现了,该项研究问道:“不尽如人意的事件中令人不满意的地方是什么?”文中讨论了对需求层次理论的启示。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验