• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一位近亲眼中的患者在生命末期参与决策的情况。

Patient participation in decision making at the end of life as seen by a close relative.

作者信息

Sahlberg-Blom E, Ternestedt B M, Johansson J E

机构信息

Department of Caring Sciences, Orebro University, S-701 82 Orebro, Sweden.

出版信息

Nurs Ethics. 2000 Jul;7(4):296-313. doi: 10.1177/096973300000700404.

DOI:10.1177/096973300000700404
PMID:11221407
Abstract

The aim of the present study was to describe variations in patient participation in decisions about care planning during the final phase of life for a group of gravely ill patients, and how the different actors' manner of acting promotes or impedes patient participation. Thirty-seven qualitative research interviews were conducted with relatives of the patients. The patients' participation in the decisions could be categorized into four variations: self-determination, co-determination, delegation and nonparticipation. The manner in which patients, relatives and caregivers acted differed in the respective variations; this seemed either to promote or to impede the patients' opportunities of participating in the decision making. The possibility for participation seems to be context dependent and affected by many factors such as the dying patient's personality, the social network, the availability of different forms of care, cultural values, and the extent to which nurses and other caregivers of the different forms of care can and want to support the wishes of the patients and relatives in the decision-making process.

摘要

本研究的目的是描述一组重症患者在生命末期护理计划决策中患者参与的差异,以及不同行为主体的行为方式如何促进或阻碍患者参与。对患者家属进行了37次定性研究访谈。患者在决策中的参与可分为四种类型:自主决定、共同决定、委托他人决定和不参与。在各自的类型中,患者、家属和护理人员的行为方式有所不同;这似乎要么促进要么阻碍了患者参与决策的机会。参与的可能性似乎取决于具体情况,并受到许多因素的影响,如临终患者的个性、社会网络、不同形式护理的可获得性、文化价值观,以及不同形式护理的护士和其他护理人员在决策过程中能够并愿意支持患者和家属意愿的程度。

相似文献

1
Patient participation in decision making at the end of life as seen by a close relative.一位近亲眼中的患者在生命末期参与决策的情况。
Nurs Ethics. 2000 Jul;7(4):296-313. doi: 10.1177/096973300000700404.
2
Initiating decision-making conversations in palliative care: an ethnographic discourse analysis.在姑息治疗中开展决策对话:一项人种志话语分析
BMC Palliat Care. 2014 Dec 23;13:63. doi: 10.1186/1472-684X-13-63. eCollection 2014.
3
Advance Care Planning in a Multicultural Family Centric Community: A Qualitative Study of Health Care Professionals', Patients', and Caregivers' Perspectives.多元文化家庭为中心的社区中的预先医疗照护计划:医疗保健专业人员、患者和照护者观点的定性研究。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2018 Aug;56(2):213-221.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2018.05.007. Epub 2018 Jun 20.
4
Patient participation in palliative care decisions: An ethnographic discourse analysis.患者参与姑息治疗决策:一项人种志话语分析
Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2016 Nov 22;11:32438. doi: 10.3402/qhw.v11.32438. eCollection 2016.
5
Cancer caregivers advocate a patient- and family-centered approach to advance care planning.癌症护理者提倡采用以患者和家庭为中心的方法进行预先护理规划。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2014 Jun;47(6):1064-77. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2013.07.009. Epub 2013 Oct 18.
6
Diagnosis, prognosis and awareness of dying in nursing homes: towards the Gold Standard?养老院中的诊断、预后和临终意识:迈向金标准?
Int J Older People Nurs. 2014 Jun;9(2):95-105. doi: 10.1111/opn.12024. Epub 2013 Feb 25.
7
Patients with cancer: their approaches to participation in treatment plan decisions.癌症患者:他们参与治疗方案决策的方式。
Nurs Ethics. 2005 Mar;12(2):143-55. doi: 10.1191/0969733005ne771oa.
8
Life-and-death decision-making in the acute phase after a severe stroke: Interviews with relatives.重症中风急性期的生死决策:对亲属的访谈
Palliat Med. 2015 May;29(5):451-7. doi: 10.1177/0269216314563427. Epub 2015 Jan 29.
9
Readiness to participate in advance care planning: A qualitative study of renal failure patients, families and healthcare providers.参与预先护理计划的意愿:对肾衰竭患者、家属及医疗服务提供者的定性研究。
Chronic Illn. 2017 Sep;13(3):171-187. doi: 10.1177/1742395316675023. Epub 2017 Jan 30.
10
End of life care: The experiences of advance care planning amongst family caregivers of people with advanced dementia - A qualitative study.终末期关怀:在患有晚期痴呆症的患者的家庭照顾者中进行预先护理计划的经验 - 一项定性研究。
Dementia (London). 2016 Sep;15(5):958-75. doi: 10.1177/1471301214548521. Epub 2014 Sep 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Moral conflicts among patients-caregivers dyads in oncological care pathway: a systematic review of the ethical literature.肿瘤护理路径中患者与护理人员二元组之间的道德冲突:伦理文献的系统综述
Support Care Cancer. 2025 Jun 6;33(7):548. doi: 10.1007/s00520-025-09548-w.
2
Exploring the ethical decision-making experience of caregivers of end stage cancer patients in Iran: a phenomenological study.探索伊朗终末期癌症患者照顾者的伦理决策体验:一项现象学研究。
BMC Med Ethics. 2024 Nov 15;25(1):130. doi: 10.1186/s12910-024-01131-y.
3
Caring for older patients with reduced decision-making capacity: a deductive exploratory study of ambulance clinicians' ethical competence.
照顾决策能力下降的老年患者:对救护临床医生伦理能力的演绎探索性研究。
BMC Med Ethics. 2023 Aug 9;24(1):60. doi: 10.1186/s12910-023-00941-w.
4
Heterogeneity and changes in preferences for dying at home: a systematic review.临终地点偏好的异质性和变化:系统评价。
BMC Palliat Care. 2013 Feb 15;12:7. doi: 10.1186/1472-684X-12-7.
5
Palliative medicine and decision science: the critical need for a shared agenda to foster informed patient choice in serious illness.缓和医学与决策科学:在重病患者中促进知情选择,迫切需要制定共同议程。
J Palliat Med. 2011 Oct;14(10):1109-16. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2011.0032. Epub 2011 Sep 6.
6
Research participation by older adults at end of life: barriers and solutions.老年人临终时的研究参与:障碍与解决方案。
Res Gerontol Nurs. 2009 Jul;2(3):162-71. doi: 10.3928/19404921-20090421-05. Epub 2009 Apr 30.