Lukashov V V, Goudsmit J
Department of Human Retrovirology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
J Virol. 2001 Mar;75(6):2729-40. doi: 10.1128/JVI.75.6.2729-2740.2001.
The current classification of parvoviruses is based on virus host range and helper virus dependence, while little data on evolutionary relationships among viruses are available. We identified and analyzed 472 sequences of parvoviruses, among which there were (virtually) full-length genomes of all 41 viruses currently recognized as individual species within the family Parvoviridae. Our phylogenetic analysis of full-length genomes as well as open reading frames distinguished three evolutionary groups of parvoviruses from vertebrates: (i) the human helper-dependent adeno-associated virus (AAV) serotypes 1 to 6 and the autonomous avian parvoviruses; (ii) the bovine, chipmunk, and autonomous primate parvoviruses, including human viruses B19 and V9; and (iii) the parvoviruses from rodents (except for chipmunks), carnivores, and pigs. Each of these three evolutionary groups could be further subdivided, reflecting both virus-host coevolution and multiple cross-species transmissions in the evolutionary history of parvoviruses. No parvoviruses from invertebrates clustered with vertebrate parvoviruses. Our analysis provided evidence for negative selection among parvoviruses, the independent evolution of their genes, and recombination among parvoviruses from rodents. The topology of the phylogenetic tree of autonomous human and simian parvoviruses matched exactly the topology of the primate family tree, as based on the analysis of primate mitochondrial DNA. Viruses belonging to the AAV group were not evolutionarily linked to other primate parvoviruses but were linked to the parvoviruses of birds. The two lineages of human parvoviruses may have resulted from independent ancient zoonotic infections. Our results provide an argument for reclassification of Parvovirinae based on evolutionary relationships among viruses.
细小病毒目前的分类基于病毒宿主范围和对辅助病毒的依赖性,而关于病毒之间进化关系的数据却很少。我们鉴定并分析了472条细小病毒序列,其中包括细小病毒科目前被认可为独立种的所有41种病毒的(几乎)全长基因组。我们对全长基因组以及开放阅读框进行的系统发育分析区分出了脊椎动物细小病毒的三个进化组:(i)人类依赖辅助病毒的腺相关病毒(AAV)血清型1至6以及自主型禽细小病毒;(ii)牛、花栗鼠和自主型灵长类细小病毒,包括人类病毒B19和V9;(iii)来自啮齿动物(花栗鼠除外)、食肉动物和猪的细小病毒。这三个进化组中的每一组都可以进一步细分,这既反映了病毒与宿主的共同进化,也反映了细小病毒进化史上的多次跨物种传播。没有无脊椎动物的细小病毒与脊椎动物细小病毒聚在一起。我们的分析为细小病毒之间的负选择、其基因的独立进化以及啮齿动物细小病毒之间的重组提供了证据。基于对灵长类动物线粒体DNA的分析,自主型人类和猿猴细小病毒的系统发育树拓扑结构与灵长类动物家族树的拓扑结构完全匹配。属于AAV组的病毒在进化上与其他灵长类细小病毒没有联系,但与鸟类的细小病毒有联系。人类细小病毒的两个谱系可能源于独立的古代人畜共患感染。我们的结果为基于病毒之间的进化关系对细小病毒亚科进行重新分类提供了依据。