• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在固定间隔强化程序下鸽子对吗啡的辨别性刺激控制。

Discriminative-stimulus control by morphine in the pigeon under a fixed-interval schedule of reinforcement.

作者信息

Massey B.W., McMillan D.E., Wessinger W.D.

机构信息

Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR 72205, USA.

出版信息

Behav Pharmacol. 1992 Oct;3(5):475-488.

PMID:11224150
Abstract

The stimulus control by morphine under a fixed-interval (FI) 180-s schedule of reinforcement was examined in five pigeons trained to discriminate 5.0mg/kg of i.m. morphine from saline. After training, dose-response relationships were determined for morphine, d-amphetamine, pentobarbital, fentanyl, and MK-801. At low doses of morphine, responding of individual subjects was predominantly on the saline-appropriate key. At intermediate doses responding occurred on both keys throughout the interval. Following doses of 5.6mg/kg and higher, responding on both keys was observed in the early portions of the interval with responding shifting to the morphine-appropriate key as the interval progressed. Thus, a graded dose-effect curve for morphine was obtained under the FI schedule. The fentanyl dose-effect curve was similar to that obtained with morphine, but the other test drugs were not generalized. Five other pigeons were trained to discriminate 5.0mg/kg of morphine from saline under a fixed-ratio (FR) 100 schedule of reinforcement. During testing with morphine, responses were confined to the saline-appropriate key at 0.3 and 1.0mg/kg of morphine, but at higher doses responses were confined to the drug key. In contrast to the results obtained using the FI schedule, a quantal relationship for responding on the two keys was observed when a FR schedule was employed.

摘要

在五只因辨别5.0毫克/千克肌肉注射吗啡与生理盐水而接受训练的鸽子中,研究了在固定间隔(FI)180秒强化程序下吗啡的刺激控制作用。训练后,测定了吗啡、右旋苯丙胺、戊巴比妥、芬太尼和MK-801的剂量-反应关系。在低剂量吗啡时,个体受试者的反应主要在与生理盐水匹配的按键上。在中等剂量时,整个间隔期间两个按键上都有反应。在5.6毫克/千克及更高剂量后,在间隔的早期阶段观察到两个按键上都有反应,随着间隔的进行,反应转移到与吗啡匹配的按键上。因此,在FI程序下获得了吗啡的分级剂量-效应曲线。芬太尼的剂量-效应曲线与吗啡相似,但其他受试药物没有产生泛化。另外五只鸽子在固定比率(FR)100强化程序下接受训练以辨别5.0毫克/千克吗啡与生理盐水。在用吗啡测试期间,在0.3和 1.0毫克/千克吗啡时反应局限于与生理盐水匹配的按键,但在更高剂量时反应局限于药物按键。与使用FI程序获得的结果相反,当采用FR程序时,观察到在两个按键上反应的量反应关系。

相似文献

1
Discriminative-stimulus control by morphine in the pigeon under a fixed-interval schedule of reinforcement.在固定间隔强化程序下鸽子对吗啡的辨别性刺激控制。
Behav Pharmacol. 1992 Oct;3(5):475-488.
2
Pentobarbital discrimination and generalization to other drugs under multiple fixed-ratio fixed-interval schedules.在多重固定比率-固定间隔时间表下戊巴比妥辨别及对其他药物的泛化
Behav Pharmacol. 1996 May;7(3):285-293.
3
Schedule control of quantal and graded dose-effect curves in a drug-drug-saline discrimination.药物-药物-生理盐水辨别中全或无反应及量反应剂量-效应曲线的时程控制
Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2001 Mar;68(3):395-402. doi: 10.1016/s0091-3057(00)00474-3.
4
Effects of opioids in morphine-treated pigeons trained to discriminate among morphine, the low-efficacy agonist nalbuphine, and saline.阿片类药物对经吗啡处理的鸽子的影响,这些鸽子经过训练以区分吗啡、低效激动剂纳布啡和生理盐水。
J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2004 Jul;310(1):150-8. doi: 10.1124/jpet.103.058503. Epub 2004 Mar 25.
5
Selective tolerance to discriminative stimulus effects of morphine or d-amphetamine.对吗啡或右旋苯丙胺辨别刺激效应的选择性耐受。
Behav Pharmacol. 1992 Jun;3(3):201-209.
6
Drug effects on multiple and alternating mixed-schedule performance.药物对多重交替混合日程行为表现的影响。
J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1981 Sep;218(3):728-33.
7
U-50, 488, saline and naltrexone discrimination in U-50, 488-treated pigeons.U-50,488、生理盐水及纳曲酮在接受U-50,488治疗的鸽子中的辨别效应
Behav Pharmacol. 1993 Oct;4(5):509-516.
8
Drug discrimination under two concurrent fixed-interval fixed-interval schedules.两种并发固定间隔固定间隔时间表下的药物辨别
J Exp Anal Behav. 2000 Jul;74(1):55-77. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2000.74-55.
9
Effects of drug discrimination history on the generalization of pentobarbital to other drugs.药物辨别史对戊巴比妥向其他药物泛化的影响。
J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1996 Jul;278(1):50-61.
10
Reinforcement frequency, but not gender, determines sensitivity to discriminative stimulus effects of morphine.强化频率而非性别决定了对吗啡辨别性刺激效应的敏感性。
Behav Pharmacol. 1998 Jul;9(4):357-62.

引用本文的文献

1
Drug discrimination in pigeons trained to discriminate among morphine, U50488, a combination of these drugs, and saline.对鸽子进行药物辨别训练,使其能够区分吗啡、U50488、这两种药物的组合以及生理盐水。
Behav Pharmacol. 2011 Sep;22(5-6):468-79. doi: 10.1097/FBP.0b013e328349ab6c.
2
Effects of amphetamine-CNS depressant combinations and of other CNS stimulants in four-choice drug discriminations.苯丙胺与中枢神经系统抑制剂组合以及其他中枢神经系统兴奋剂在四选药物辨别中的作用。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2005 Jul;84(1):77-97. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2005.09-04.
3
Drug discrimination under concurrent variable-ratio variable-ratio schedules.
在并发可变比率-可变比率时间表下的药物辨别
J Exp Anal Behav. 2002 Jan;77(1):91-104. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2002.77-91.
4
Drug discrimination under two concurrent fixed-interval fixed-interval schedules.两种并发固定间隔固定间隔时间表下的药物辨别
J Exp Anal Behav. 2000 Jul;74(1):55-77. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2000.74-55.
5
Drug discrimination in rats under concurrent variable-interval variable-interval schedules.在同时可变间隔-可变间隔时间表下大鼠的药物辨别
J Exp Anal Behav. 2000 Jan;73(1):103-20. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2000.73-103.
6
Drug discrimination under a concurrent fixed-ratio fixed-ratio schedule.在同时进行的固定比率-固定比率时间表下的药物辨别
J Exp Anal Behav. 1999 Sep;72(2):187-204. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1999.72-187.
7
Drug discrimination under a concurrent fixed-interval fixed-interval schedule.在同时进行的固定间隔-固定间隔时间表下的药物辨别。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1997 Sep;68(2):193-217. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1997.68-193.
8
Drug discrimination under a concurrent schedule.并发程序下的药物辨别
J Exp Anal Behav. 1996 May;65(3):495-512. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1996.65-495.
9
Drug discrimination is a continuous rather than a quantal process following training on a VI-TO schedule of reinforcement.
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1994 Jan;113(3-4):289-96; discussion 297-303. doi: 10.1007/BF02245196.