Drug discrimination is a continuous rather than a quantal process following training on a VI-TO schedule of reinforcement.

Debate continues as to whether drug discrimination in animals is an inherently quantal or continuous process. This issue is important in determining the appropriate interpretation of results from drug discrimination studies designed to assess the nature of drug-induced interoceptive cues. The quantal approach holds that subjects perceive a drug cue in an all-or-none manner, while the continuous view proposes that when appropriate training and testing procedures are used, subjects can discriminate along a continuum of interoceptive cues. Data consistent with the quantal view have consistently been generated by animals trained to respond on schedules of reinforcement having an FR component. Since quantal responding is a characteristic of these schedules, results from drug discrimination studies using training schedules with FR components are of little value in empirically determining whether drug discrimination reflects a quantal or continuous process. Use of variable schedules of reinforcement might be more appropriate because the pattern of responding generated does not preclude results consistent with either of the competing views. Data from the following studies that trained subjects using VI schedules with a concurrent TO for incorrect lever responding were analyzed: Barrett et al. (1982): L-5-hydroxytryptophan versus saline; Smith (1990): diazepam versus pentylenetetrazol; Barrett et al. (1992): amphetamine versus haloperidol; Barrett and Steranka (1983): amphetamine versus haloperidol. In every case, when experimental conditions produced a group mean intermediate to that for the training drugs, the distribution of scores for individual animals was normally rather than bimodally distributed.