Schaal D.W., Jewett D.C., Schuh K.J.
Department of Psychology, University of Minnesota, 75 E. River Road, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.
Behav Pharmacol. 1994 Oct;5(6):630-636. doi: 10.1097/00008877-199410000-00009.
Six pigeons were studied to determine whether the brightness of a houselight interacted with the stimuli produced by methadone, and whether the nature of the interaction depended on the order of training of the two discriminations. Three pigeons were trained to peck the right key after methadone (2.0mg/kg) and the left key after saline, when the houselight was dim. The effects of a range of methadone doses (0.5, 1.0, 2.0mg/kg and saline) were tested. Three other pigeons were trained, in the absence of drug, to peck the right key when the houselight was dim and the left key when the houselight was bright. The effects of a range of houselight intensities were tested. Then, for both groups, right-key pecks were reinforced in the presence of methadone and the dim houselight, and left-key pecks were reinforced in the presence of saline and the bright houselight. Methadone doses were tested in the presence of both houselight brightnesses used in training. All pigeons pecked the methadone-appropriate key after high doses of methadone, regardless of houselight intensity. All pigeons trained to discriminate houselight brightness first, and one of the pigeons trained to discriminate methadone first, pecked according to the houselight condition when saline and lower doses were tested. In the other pigeon trained to discriminate methadone first, pecking was more related to drug dose. These data show that a drug stimulus can compete with external stimuli for behavioral control, that a drug stimulus can assume control over behavior originally controlled by external stimuli, and that discriminations based on external stimuli may be retained when saline or low doses of drug are administered.
研究了六只鸽子,以确定饲养箱灯光的亮度是否与美沙酮产生的刺激相互作用,以及这种相互作用的性质是否取决于两种辨别训练的顺序。三只鸽子在饲养箱灯光昏暗时,接受训练在注射美沙酮(2.0毫克/千克)后啄右侧按键,注射生理盐水后啄左侧按键。测试了一系列美沙酮剂量(0.5、1.0、2.0毫克/千克和生理盐水)的效果。另外三只鸽子在未使用药物的情况下接受训练,在饲养箱灯光昏暗时啄右侧按键,在饲养箱灯光明亮时啄左侧按键。测试了一系列饲养箱灯光强度的效果。然后,对两组鸽子来说,在美沙酮和昏暗饲养箱灯光出现时,右侧按键啄击行为得到强化,在生理盐水和明亮饲养箱灯光出现时,左侧按键啄击行为得到强化。在训练中使用的两种饲养箱灯光亮度条件下,测试了美沙酮剂量。所有鸽子在高剂量美沙酮后都啄向与美沙酮对应的按键,无论饲养箱灯光强度如何。所有先接受辨别饲养箱灯光训练的鸽子,以及一只先接受辨别美沙酮训练的鸽子,在测试生理盐水和较低剂量药物时,会根据饲养箱灯光条件进行啄击。在另一只先接受辨别美沙酮训练的鸽子中,啄击行为与药物剂量的关系更大。这些数据表明,药物刺激可以与外部刺激竞争对行为的控制,药物刺激可以获得对原本由外部刺激控制的行为的控制,并且当给予生理盐水或低剂量药物时,基于外部刺激的辨别可能会保留下来。