Houltz B, Darpö B, Swedberg K, Blomström P, Crijns H J, Jensen S M, Svernhage E, Edvardsson N
Department of Medicine, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Ostra, Göteborg, Sweden.
Europace. 2000 Jan;2(1):20-31. doi: 10.1053/eupc.1999.0068.
Drug-induced increase in QT dispersion has been associated with increased risk of ventricular proarrhythmia. The aim of the present study was to compare QT dispersion during atrial fibrillation and sinus rhythm in the same patients at normal and prolonged ventricular repolarization.
Sixty-one patients who had had chronic atrial fibrillation for 8 +/- 14 months received a 6 h infusion of the Ikr-blocker almokalant, the first 90 min of which are used for this analysis. The following day, after conversion to sinus rhythm, by almokalant (n = 19) or direct current cardioversion (n=42), an identical 90 min infusion was administered. Prior to infusion, there was no difference in precordial QT dispersion between atrial fibrillation and sinus rhythm (29 +/- 12 vs 36 +/- 17 ms, P=ns). During infusion, at prolonged repolarization, the increase in QT dispersion was greater during sinus rhythm than during atrial fibrillation (58 +/- 49 vs 30 +/- 15 ms, P=0.0011, after 30 min infusion). No correlation was found between QT dispersion and the QT or RR interval.
QT dispersion during atrial fibrillation does not differ from QT dispersion during sinus rhythm during normal repolarization. while measurement of QT dispersion during prolonged repolarization, induced by an Ikr-blocker, yielded larger values during sinus rhythm than during atrial fibrillation.
药物诱导的QT离散度增加与室性心律失常风险增加相关。本研究的目的是比较同一患者在正常和延长心室复极时房颤和窦性心律期间的QT离散度。
61例慢性房颤8±14个月的患者接受了6小时的Ikr阻滞剂almokalant静脉输注,本分析采用前90分钟的数据。次日,在通过almokalant(n = 19)或直流电复律(n = 42)转为窦性心律后,给予相同的90分钟输注。输注前,房颤和窦性心律之间的心前区QT离散度无差异(29±12 vs 36±17 ms,P =无显著性差异)。在输注期间,在延长复极时,窦性心律期间QT离散度的增加大于房颤期间(输注30分钟后,58±49 vs 30±15 ms,P = 0.0011)。未发现QT离散度与QT或RR间期之间存在相关性。
在正常复极期间,房颤期间的QT离散度与窦性心律期间的QT离散度无差异。而在Ikr阻滞剂诱导的延长复极期间测量QT离散度时,窦性心律期间的值大于房颤期间。