Schwaab B, Kindermann M, Fröhlig G, Berg M, Kusch O, Schieffer H
Universitätskliniken, Innere Medizin III, 66421 Homburg/Saar.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2001 Jan;24(1):28-33. doi: 10.1046/j.1460-9592.2001.00028.x.
In 120 consecutive patients with standard pacing indications, we tested the feasibility of RV septal lead implantation technique guided by surface ECG and the degree to which this technique reduces paced QRS duration compared to RV apical stimulation when passive-fixation leads are used. During implantation, an ECG was recorded with a paper speed of 100 mm/s using the orthogonal Frank leads, and QRS was measured from the earliest to the latest deflection in any of the Frank leads. Pace-mapping of the septum was performed until QRS was minimal. The lead was attached, where QRS, pacing threshold, lead impedance, and EGM amplitude provided the best compromise. An average of 3.7 +/- 2.5 attempts (range 1-18, median 7) was needed until a final implantation site was found. There were no technical problems during implantation. QRS could be reduced by 5-55 ms (mean delta QRS 19 +/- 11 ms) in 83 (69%) of 120 patients. In 22 (18%) patients, QRS was identical with apical and septal pacing, and in 15 (13%) patients, QRS was 5-20 ms (10 +/- 4) longer despite septal stimulation. Average QRS was significantly shorter during septal pacing compared with apical pacing (151 +/- 20 vs 162 +/- 23 ms, P < 0.001). There was a tendency towards greatest QRS reduction when the high septum was stimulated (22 +/- 11 ms reduction) as compared with mid- (18 +/- 11 ms) or apical parts of the RV septum (16 +/- 10 ms). QRS reduction was most likely if apical QRS width was > 170 ms (P = 0.0002), and there was an inverse correlation between apical QRS and delta QRS (r = 0.53, P < 10(-7)). During a mean follow-up of 14 months, there was no pacing or sensing problem and no lead dislodgment occurred.
在120例有标准起搏指征的连续患者中,我们测试了在使用被动固定电极导线时,体表心电图引导下右室间隔部电极导线植入技术的可行性,以及与右室心尖部起搏相比,该技术缩短起搏QRS波时限的程度。植入过程中,使用正交Frank导联以100mm/s的纸速记录心电图,并从任何一个Frank导联最早至最晚的偏转处测量QRS波。进行间隔部起搏标测,直至QRS波最窄。在QRS波、起搏阈值、电极导线阻抗和心内膜电图振幅达到最佳平衡的位置固定电极导线。平均需要3.7±2.5次尝试(范围1 - 18次,中位数7次)才能找到最终的植入部位。植入过程中没有技术问题。120例患者中有83例(69%)的QRS波时限可缩短5 - 55ms(平均ΔQRS 19±11ms)。22例(18%)患者的QRS波在间隔部起搏和心尖部起搏时相同,15例(13%)患者尽管进行了间隔部刺激,QRS波时限仍比心尖部起搏时长5 - 20ms(10±4ms)。与心尖部起搏相比,间隔部起搏时平均QRS波时限显著缩短(151±20ms对162±23ms,P<0.001)。与右室间隔中部(18±11ms缩短)或心尖部(16±10ms缩短)相比,刺激高位间隔部时QRS波时限缩短幅度最大(22±11ms缩短)。如果心尖部QRS波宽度>170ms,则QRS波时限最有可能缩短(P = 0.0002),且心尖部QRS波与ΔQRS之间呈负相关(r = 0.53,P<10⁻⁷)。在平均14个月的随访期间,没有发生起搏或感知问题,也没有电极导线脱位。