Kosak M C, Reding M J
Burke Rehabilitation Hospital, Cornell University Medical College, 785 Mamaroneck Avenue, White Plains, NY 10605, USA.
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2000;14(1):13-9. doi: 10.1177/154596830001400102.
To test the hypothesis that partial body weight-supported treadmill training (PBWSTT) provides more effective gait training than an equally supportive but less physiologic aggressive bracing assisted walking (ABAW) program.
Following informed consent, patients participating in an inpatient rehabilitation program with significant leg weakness and need for at least moderate assistance for walking, without orthostatic hypotension, symptomatic dyspnea, or angina pectoris were randomized to receive PBWSTT vs. ABAW. PBWSTT was provided by a commercially available, overhead motorized hoist attached to a parachute-type body harness, which provided partial support of the patient's weight over a treadmill. Therapists assisted with weight shifting, leg advancement, and foot placement as needed. ABAW included aggressive early therapist-assisted ambulation using knee-ankle combination bracing and hemi-bar if needed. Treatment sessions of up to 45 minutes per day, five days per week were given as tolerated for the duration of the inpatient stay or until patients could walk over-ground unassisted. All patients had an additional 45-minute session of functionally oriented physical therapy each day with or without bracing as judged appropriate by the patient's individual therapist.
Fifty-six patients a mean age of 71 +/- 1 SEM were enrolled 40 +/- 3 days post stroke. Although the outcome of the two groups as a whole did not differ, a subgroup with major hemispheric stroke defined by the presence of hemiparesis, hemianopic visual deficit, and hemihypesthesia who received more than 12 treatment sessions showed significantly better over-ground endurance (90 +/- 34 vs. 44 +/- 10 meters) and speed scores (12 +/- 4 vs. 8 +/- 2 meters/minute) for PBWSTT vs. ABAW, respectively.
PBWSTT and ABAW are equally effective gait training techniques except for a subset of patients with major hemispheric stroke who are difficult to mobilize using ABAW alone.
验证以下假设:部分体重支撑跑步机训练(PBWSTT)比同样具有支撑作用但生理干预性较弱的支具辅助步行(ABAW)计划能提供更有效的步态训练。
在获得知情同意后,将参与住院康复计划、有明显腿部无力且行走至少需要中度辅助、无体位性低血压、症状性呼吸困难或心绞痛的患者随机分为接受PBWSTT组和ABAW组。PBWSTT通过连接在降落伞式身体背带上的市售高架电动起重机提供,该起重机在跑步机上为患者体重提供部分支撑。治疗师根据需要协助患者进行体重转移、腿部推进和足部放置。ABAW包括早期积极的治疗师辅助步行,必要时使用膝踝联合支具和半杆。每天进行长达45分钟的治疗,每周五天,根据住院时间耐受情况进行,或直至患者能够在无辅助的情况下在地面行走。所有患者每天还接受45分钟的功能导向性物理治疗,是否使用支具由患者的个体治疗师根据情况判断。
56例平均年龄为71±1个标准误的患者在中风后40±3天入组。尽管两组总体结果无差异,但在接受超过12次治疗的、由偏瘫、偏盲性视觉缺陷和偏身感觉减退定义的大脑半球大面积中风亚组中,PBWSTT组和ABAW组相比,地面耐力(分别为90±34米和44±10米)和速度得分(分别为12±4米/分钟和8±2米/分钟)明显更好。
PBWSTT和ABAW是同样有效的步态训练技术,但对于大脑半球大面积中风的部分患者,单独使用ABAW难以使其活动。