Amano A, Hirose H, Takahashi A, Nagano N
Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Shin-Tokyo Hospital, 473-1 Nemoto, Matsudo City, Chiba 271-0077, Japan.
Jpn J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2001 Jan;49(1):67-78. doi: 10.1007/BF02913127.
Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) on the beating heart has become popular procedure in cardiac surgery and its initial results appeared favorable. We report our early and mid-term results of off-pump CABG performed at Shin-Tokyo Hospital.
Medical records of patients undergoing off-pump or conventional on-pump CABG from September 1, 1996, to August 31, 1999 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients underwent off-pump CABG were further classified into 2 groups; MIDCAB (Off-pump CABG for single vessel revascularization via a small skin incision) and OPCAB (off-pump CABG mainly approached via midline sternotomy) group. Their preoperative, perioperative, and follow-up data were collected and analyzed.
Among a total of 995 cases of CABG, 194 cases were off-pump CABG (male/female 142/52, mean age 66.9). The mean number of distal anastomoses in off-pump CABG was 1.9 +/- 0.9 (1.0 +/- 0.0 in MIDCAB and 2.3 +/- 0.7 in OPCAB), which was significantly fewer than in on-pump CABG (3.6 +/- 1.1), with p < 0.0001. Intubation time (5.3 +/- 5.7 hours in off-pump CABG vs 13.1 +/- 24.2 hours in on-pump CABG), ICU stay (1.7 +/- 1.1 vs 3.2 +/- 3.0 days), and postoperative hospital stay (14.0 +/- 7.9 vs 18.1 +/- 12.1 days) in off-pump CABG were significantly shorter than in on-pump CABG (p < 0.0001). In the off-pump CABG group, there were no in-hospital deaths and 14 major complications, fewer than in on-pump CABG (8 hospital deaths and 114 major complications). Postoperative angiography before hospital discharge was conducted in 80 patients (41.2%) and showed 2 occlusions, giving a graft patency rate of 98.6% in the off-pump group. During follow-up (0.9 +/- 0.6 year) period, there were 5 non-cardiac deaths and 20 cardiac events in the off-pump group. The actuarial survival rate at 36 months was 94.6% for off-pump CABG, showing no significant difference from the rate for conventional CABG patients (95.2% at 36 month, p = NS) The event-free rate was 84.0% at 36 months in off-pump CABG patients; however, which was less favorable than on-pump CABG patients (88.0% at 36 months, p < 0.05).
Both in-hospital and mid-term results for off-pump CABG patients were acceptable. Isolated CABG can thus be safely performed without cardiopulmonary bypass. Advances in coronary stabilization have contributed to these improved results. The observed long-term cardiac events may be related to incomplete revascularization.
非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG),即心脏跳动下的冠状动脉搭桥手术,已成为心脏外科中一种常用的手术方式,其初期效果似乎良好。我们报告在新东京医院进行的非体外循环CABG的早期和中期结果。
回顾性分析1996年9月1日至1999年8月31日期间接受非体外循环或传统体外循环CABG患者的病历。接受非体外循环CABG的患者进一步分为两组;微创直接冠状动脉搭桥术(MIDCAB,即通过小切口皮肤进行单支血管血运重建的非体外循环CABG)和非体外循环冠状动脉搭桥术(OPCAB,主要通过正中胸骨切开术进行的非体外循环CABG)组。收集并分析他们的术前、围手术期和随访数据。
在总共995例CABG病例中,194例为非体外循环CABG(男/女142/52,平均年龄66.9岁)。非体外循环CABG的远端吻合平均数量为1.9±0.9(MIDCAB为1.0±0.0,OPCAB为2.3±0.7),明显少于体外循环CABG(3.6±1.1),p<0.0001。非体外循环CABG的插管时间(5.3±5.7小时,而体外循环CABG为13.1±24.2小时)、重症监护病房停留时间(1.7±1.1天对3.2±3.0天)和术后住院时间(14.0±7.9天对18.1±12.1天)均明显短于体外循环CABG(p<0.0001)。在非体外循环CABG组中,无院内死亡病例,有14例主要并发症,少于体外循环CABG(8例院内死亡和114例主要并发症)。80例患者(41.2%)在出院前进行了术后血管造影,结果显示2例闭塞,非体外循环组的移植血管通畅率为98.6%。在随访(0.9±0.6年)期间,非体外循环组有5例非心脏死亡和20例心脏事件。非体外循环CABG在36个月时的精算生存率为94.6%,与传统CABG患者的生存率(36个月时为95.2%,p=无显著性差异)无显著差异。非体外循环CABG患者在36个月时的无事件发生率为84.0%;然而,这比体外循环CABG患者(36个月时为88.0%,p<0.05)要差。
非体外循环CABG患者的院内和中期结果均可接受。因此,单纯CABG可以在不进行心肺转流的情况下安全进行。冠状动脉稳定技术的进步促成了这些改善的结果。观察到的长期心脏事件可能与血运重建不完全有关。