Epidemiology in the strategies for malaria control.

A rapid overview is presented of the evolution of the main orientations of malaria control, since the discovery of mosquito transmission. Stated control objectives appear to have oscillated between expectations to eradicate the vector, or at least the disease, and more modest approaches to minimise the effects of the infection. High optimism was raised when a new control measure, or new combination of existing measures, appeared to be highly effective and was expected to have universal applicability. The implementation of large scale campaigns eventually found the limits of applicability of the proposed strategy and the exaggerated expectations soon gave way to disillusion and, eventually, to a revival of research. The longest and most impacting period of exaggerated expectations was the global malaria eradication campaign of the 1950s and 1960s, which completely disregarded the study of local epidemiology, considering that all it was needed was to know if an area was "malarious" or not. Research was practically abandoned and, even when reinstated after the recognised failure of the campaign, it has retained an almost exclusive orientation towards the development of control tools, drugs or eventually vaccines. One of the earliest victims of the eradication campaign was the study of epidemic malaria and its determinants in different epidemic prone areas. In spite of an extremely long period of disillusion, lasting for almost two decades, the reality of the malaria problem led WHO and member countries to agree on a global strategy of control, aiming at a realistic use of existing tools, to at least reduce or prevent mortality. An essential element of this strategy is the prevention or control of malaria epidemics and the selective use of vector control, both of which have to be based on a solid knowledge of local epidemiology, the study of which has to rejoin the path abandoned fifty years ago.