Singh D, Maley R H, Santucci T, Macherey R S, Bartley S, Weyant R J, Landreneau R J
Division of General Thoracic Surgery, Allegheny General Hospital, University of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15212-4772, USA.
Ann Thorac Surg. 2001 Feb;71(2):419-24. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(00)02337-7.
Anastomotic leak from cervical esophagogastric anastomoses is a serious problem after esophagectomy. We explored the efficacy of partial or total mechanical anastomoses accomplished with the endoscopic linear cutting and stapling device as an alternative to hand-sewn anastomotic techniques.
During a 42-month period, 93 patients undergoing either transhiatal esophagectomy or a three-incisional approach to esophagectomy underwent either hand-sewn (n = 43), partial mechanical (n = 16), or totally mechanical (n = 34) cervical esophagogastric anastomoses. The occurrence of postoperative anastomotic leak and the development of postoperative anastomotic stricturing requiring dilation therapy were analyzed between these groups using chi2.
All patients survived esophagectomy and were available for postoperative follow-up. Anastomotic leak developed in 10 patients (23%) with hand-sewn, 1 patient (6%) with partial mechanical, and 1 patient (3%) with total mechanical anastomoses (p < 0.05). Anastomotic stricture development paralleled the occurrence of anastomotic leak rate with 25 patients (58%) with hand-sewn, 3 patients (19%) with partial mechanical, and 6 patients (18%) with total mechanical anastomoses experiencing strictures requiring dilation therapy (p < 0.05).
These results suggest that partial or mechanical cervical esophagogastric anastomoses created with the endoscopic stapling device may be superior to hand-sewn anastomotic techniques.
食管切除术后,颈段食管胃吻合口漏是一个严重的问题。我们探讨了使用内镜直线切割吻合器完成部分或全机械吻合作为手工缝合吻合技术替代方法的疗效。
在42个月期间,93例行经裂孔食管切除术或三切口食管切除术的患者接受了手工缝合(n = 43)、部分机械吻合(n = 16)或全机械吻合(n = 34)的颈段食管胃吻合术。使用卡方检验分析这些组之间术后吻合口漏的发生率以及需要扩张治疗的术后吻合口狭窄的发生情况。
所有患者均在食管切除术后存活并可进行术后随访。手工缝合组有10例患者(23%)发生吻合口漏,部分机械吻合组有1例患者(6%)发生,全机械吻合组有1例患者(3%)发生(p < 0.05)。吻合口狭窄的发生与吻合口漏率平行,手工缝合组有25例患者(58%)、部分机械吻合组有3例患者(19%)、全机械吻合组有6例患者(18%)发生需要扩张治疗的狭窄(p < 0.05)。
这些结果表明,使用内镜吻合器进行部分或机械性颈段食管胃吻合可能优于手工缝合吻合技术。