Suppr超能文献

择期剖宫产抗生素预防的随机对照试验。

A randomised controlled trial of antibiotic prophylaxis in elective caesarean delivery.

作者信息

Bagratee J S, Moodley J, Kleinschmidt I, Zawilski W

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Nelson R Mandela School of Medicine, University of Natal, South Africa.

出版信息

BJOG. 2001 Feb;108(2):143-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2001.00042.x.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether prophylactic antibiotic administration using cefoxitin at the time of elective caesarean section significantly reduces infectious morbidity.

SETTING

A tertiary teaching hospital in a large urban city in South Africa.

PARTICIPANTS

Women undergoing elective caesarean section.

DESIGN

A prospective, double-blind randomised placebo-controlled trial.

METHODS

Four hundred and eighty women undergoing elective caesarean section had cefoxitin or placebo administration after umbilical cord clamping. Postpartum complications including febrile morbidity, wound infection, endometritis, urinary tract infection, pneumonia and transient postpartum fever were recorded, as were the duration of hospital stay and the need for therapeutic antibiotics.

RESULTS

Wound infection was the most common complication occurring in 13.3% and 12.5% of women in the placebo and cefoxitin groups, respectively. Prophylactic antibiotics did not decrease febrile morbidity, wound infection, endometritis, urinary tract infection and pneumonia. Women who received cefoxitin stayed on average a day less in hospital than those who received placebo (6.9 vs 7.8 days, risk difference 0.94 CI 1.57 - 0.31 days). Eleven women (4.6%) in the placebo group and eight (3.4%) in the cefoxitin group had microbiological evidence of wound infection. Staphylococcus aureus was the most common pathogen (43%) isolated. Similar proportions in both groups (6.3% placebo and 5.1% cefoxitin) required a course of therapeutic antibiotics.

CONCLUSION

Antibiotic prophylaxis with cefoxitin in elective caesarean section did not reduce post-operative infectious morbidity in this double-blind randomised placebo controlled trial.

摘要

目的

确定在择期剖宫产时使用头孢西丁预防性应用抗生素是否能显著降低感染发病率。

地点

南非一个大城市的三级教学医院。

参与者

接受择期剖宫产的妇女。

设计

一项前瞻性、双盲、随机、安慰剂对照试验。

方法

480例接受择期剖宫产的妇女在脐带结扎后接受头孢西丁或安慰剂治疗。记录产后并发症,包括发热性疾病、伤口感染、子宫内膜炎、尿路感染、肺炎和短暂性产后发热,以及住院时间和使用治疗性抗生素的必要性。

结果

伤口感染是最常见的并发症,安慰剂组和头孢西丁组的发生率分别为13.3%和12.5%。预防性抗生素并未降低发热性疾病、伤口感染、子宫内膜炎、尿路感染和肺炎的发生率。接受头孢西丁治疗的妇女平均住院时间比接受安慰剂治疗的妇女少一天(6.9天对7.8天,风险差异0.94,可信区间1.57 - 0.31天)。安慰剂组有11名妇女(4.6%),头孢西丁组有8名妇女(3.4%)有伤口感染的微生物学证据。金黄色葡萄球菌是最常见的分离病原体(43%)。两组中需要接受一个疗程治疗性抗生素的比例相似(安慰剂组为6.3%,头孢西丁组为5.1%)。

结论

在这项双盲随机安慰剂对照试验中,择期剖宫产时使用头孢西丁进行抗生素预防并不能降低术后感染发病率。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验