• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

责任改变、认知定势和榜样作用对身体攻击及去个体化的影响。

Effects of altered responsibility, congnitive set, and modeling on physical aggression and deindividuation.

作者信息

Diener E, Dineen J, Endresen K, Beaman A L, Fraser S C

出版信息

J Pers Soc Psychol. 1975 Feb;31(2):328-37. doi: 10.1037/h0076279.

DOI:10.1037/h0076279
PMID:1123716
Abstract

This laboratory investigation using 64 college students as subjects assessed the role of three disinhibiting variables in producing both physical aggression and an internal state of deindividuation. Altered responsibility, congnitive set, and modeling were manipulated in a factorial design, and all three variables significantly increased physical aggression. No interaction produced significant results. The increase due to altered responsibility and varying cognitions supports Zimbardo's theory of deindividuation which relates certain input variables to wild, impulsive behavior. Questionnaire data indicated that the increase in aggression was not accompanied by internal mediational factors such as reduced self-awareness. It appears that disinhibiting forces may produce increases in antisocial behavior without necessarily producing a deindividuated internal state.

摘要

这项以64名大学生为研究对象的实验室调查,评估了三个去抑制变量在引发身体攻击行为和去个性化内在状态方面所起的作用。在析因设计中对责任改变、认知定势和模仿进行了操控,所有这三个变量都显著增加了身体攻击行为。没有交互作用产生显著结果。责任改变和认知变化导致的攻击行为增加,支持了津巴多的去个性化理论,该理论将某些输入变量与狂野、冲动行为联系起来。问卷调查数据表明,攻击行为的增加并没有伴随着诸如自我意识降低等内部调节因素。似乎去抑制力量可能会导致反社会行为增加,而不一定会产生去个性化的内在状态。

相似文献

1
Effects of altered responsibility, congnitive set, and modeling on physical aggression and deindividuation.责任改变、认知定势和榜样作用对身体攻击及去个体化的影响。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1975 Feb;31(2):328-37. doi: 10.1037/h0076279.
2
Effects of prior destructive behavior, anonymity, and group presence on deindividuation and aggression.
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1976 May;33(5):497-507. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.33.5.497.
3
Effects of deindividuating situational cues and aggressive models on subjective deindividuation and aggression.去个性化情境线索和攻击性榜样对主观去个性化及攻击性的影响。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1980 Jul;39(1):104-13. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.39.1.104.
4
Effects of personality and loss of anonymity on aggression: a reevaluation of deindividuation.人格与匿名性丧失对攻击性的影响:去个体化的重新评估
J Pers. 1979 Sep;47(3):530-45. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1979.tb00631.x.
5
Effects of deindividuation, removal of responsibility, and coaction on impulsive and cyclical aggression.去个体化、责任免除和共同行动对冲动性和周期性攻击行为的影响。
J Psychol. 1975 Jul;90(2d Half):163-9. doi: 10.1080/00223980.1975.9915771.
6
Group Aggression.群体攻击。
Curr Opin Psychol. 2018 Feb;19:43-48. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.03.031. Epub 2017 Apr 10.
7
Self-awareness, deindividuation, and social identity: unraveling theoretical paradoxes by filling empirical lacunae.自我意识、去个性化与社会认同:通过填补实证空白来解开理论悖论
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2003 Sep;29(9):1071-81. doi: 10.1177/0146167203252747.
8
The effect of a self-management training package on the transfer of aggression control procedures in the absence of supervision.自我管理培训方案对在无监督情况下攻击控制程序迁移的影响。
Behav Modif. 1995 Oct;19(4):464-90. doi: 10.1177/01454455950194004.
9
Deindividuation, anonymity, and violence: findings from Northern Ireland.去个体化、匿名性与暴力:来自北爱尔兰的研究发现
J Soc Psychol. 2003 Aug;143(4):493-9. doi: 10.1080/00224540309598458.
10
A reinterpretation of research on aggression.对攻击行为研究的重新诠释。
Psychol Bull. 1974 Sep;81(9):540-62. doi: 10.1037/h0037028.

引用本文的文献

1
Why Do Individuals Engage in In-Play Sports Betting? A Qualitative Interview Study.为什么个人会参与即场体育博彩?一项定性访谈研究。
J Gambl Stud. 2021 Mar;37(1):221-240. doi: 10.1007/s10899-020-09968-9.
2
Moral Disengagement Strategies in Sex Offenders.性犯罪者的道德推脱策略
Psychiatr Psychol Law. 2016 Dec 1;24(3):470-480. doi: 10.1080/13218719.2016.1252291. eCollection 2017.
3
A professor's moral thinking at the abstract level versus the professor's moral thinking in the real life situation (consistency problem).
教授在抽象层面上的道德思维与教授在现实生活情境中的道德思维(一致性问题)。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2011 Jun;17(2):299-320. doi: 10.1007/s11948-009-9190-x. Epub 2010 Jan 27.