Titus-Ernstoff L, Perez K, Cramer D W, Harlow B L, Baron J A, Greenberg E R
Department of Community and Family Medicine, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center and the Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Lebanon, NH 03756, USA.
Br J Cancer. 2001 Mar 2;84(5):714-21. doi: 10.1054/bjoc.2000.1596.
We assessed menstrual and reproductive factors in relation to ovarian cancer risk in a large, population-based, case-control study. 563 cases in Massachusetts and New Hampshire were ascertained from hospitals and statewide tumour registries; control women (n = 523) were selected through random digit dialing and matched to case women by age and telephone sampling unit. We used multivariate logistic regression to evaluate factors in relation to risk of ovarian cancer and the major tumour histologic subtypes. Ovarian cancer risk was reduced among parous women, relative to nulliparous women (OR = 0.4; 95% CI = 0.3-0.6). Among parous women, higher parity (P = 0.0006), increased age at first (P = 0.03) or last (P = 0.05) birth, and time since last birth (P = 0.04) were associated with reduced risk. Early pregnancy losses, abortions, and stillbirths were unrelated to risk, but preterm, term, and twin births were protective. Risk was lower among women who had breast-fed, relative to those who had not (OR = 0.7; 95% CI = 0.5-1.0), but the average duration of breast-feeding per child was unrelated to risk (P for trend = 0.21). Age at menarche and age at menopause were unrelated to risk overall, although increasing menarcheal age was protective among premenopausal women (P = 0.02). Menstrual cycle characteristics and symptoms were generally unrelated to risk, although cycle-related insomnia was associated with decreased risk (OR = 0.5; 95% CI = 0.3-0.8). We found no association between the type of sanitary product used during menstruation and ovarian cancer risk. In analyses by histologic subtype, reproductive and menstrual factors had most effect on risk of endometrioid/clear cell tumours, and least influential with regard to risk of mucinous tumours. Overall, our findings offer some support to current hypotheses of ovarian pathogenesis, and show aetiologic differences among the tumour subtypes.
在一项基于人群的大型病例对照研究中,我们评估了与卵巢癌风险相关的月经和生殖因素。从马萨诸塞州和新罕布什尔州的医院及全州肿瘤登记处确定了563例病例;通过随机数字拨号选择对照女性(n = 523),并按年龄和电话抽样单位与病例女性进行匹配。我们使用多变量逻辑回归来评估与卵巢癌风险及主要肿瘤组织学亚型相关的因素。与未生育女性相比,生育过的女性患卵巢癌的风险降低(比值比[OR]=0.4;95%置信区间[CI]=0.3 - 0.6)。在生育过的女性中,较高的产次(P = 0.0006)、首次(P = 0.03)或末次(P = 0.05)生育年龄增加以及末次生育后的时间(P = 0.04)与风险降低相关。早期妊娠丢失、流产和死产与风险无关,但早产、足月产和双胎分娩具有保护作用。与未哺乳的女性相比,哺乳女性的风险较低(OR = 0.7;95% CI = 0.5 - 1.0),但每个孩子的平均哺乳时长与风险无关(趋势P值 = 0.21)。初潮年龄和绝经年龄总体上与风险无关,尽管初潮年龄增加对绝经前女性有保护作用(P = 0.02)。月经周期特征和症状一般与风险无关,尽管与周期相关的失眠与风险降低有关(OR = 0.5;95% CI = 0.3 - 0.8)。我们发现月经期间使用的卫生用品类型与卵巢癌风险之间没有关联。在按组织学亚型进行的分析中,生殖和月经因素对子宫内膜样/透明细胞肿瘤的风险影响最大,对黏液性肿瘤风险的影响最小。总体而言,我们的研究结果为当前卵巢发病机制假说提供了一些支持,并显示了肿瘤亚型之间的病因差异。