Purohit B C
Social Service Area, Administrative Staff College of India, Bella Vista, Rajbhavan Road, Hyderabad-500 082, India.
Health Policy Plan. 2001 Mar;16(1):87-97. doi: 10.1093/heapol/16.1.87.
In the recent past the impact of structural adjustment in the Indian health care sector has been felt in the reduction in central grants to States for public health and disease control programmes. This falling share of central grants has had a more pronounced impact on the poorer states, which have found it more difficult to raise local resources to compensate for this loss of revenue. With the continued pace of reforms, the likelihood of increasing State expenditure on the health care sector is limited in the future. As a result, a number of notable trends are appearing in the Indian health care sector. These include an increasing investment by non-resident Indians (NRIs) in the hospital industry, leading to a spurt in corporatization in the States of their original domicile and an increasing participation by multinational companies in diagnostics aiming to capture the potential of the Indian health insurance market. The policy responses to these private initiatives are reflected in measures comprising strategies to attract private sector participation and management inputs into primary health care centres (PHCs), privatization or semi-privatization of public health facilities such as non-clinical services in public hospitals, innovating ways to finance public health facilities through non-budgetary measures, and tax incentives by the State governments to encourage private sector investment in the health sector. Bearing in mind the vital importance of such market forces and policy responses in shaping the future health care scenario in India, this paper examines in detail both of these aspects and their implications for the Indian health care sector. The analysis indicates that despite the promising newly emerging atmosphere, there are limits to market forces; appropriate refinement in the role of government should be attempted to avoid undesirable consequences of rising costs, increasing inequity and consumer exploitation. This may require opening the health insurance market to multinational companies, the proper channelling of tax incentives to set up medical institutions in backward areas, and reinforcing appropriate regulatory mechanisms.
近年来,印度医疗保健部门结构调整的影响体现在中央政府对各邦公共卫生和疾病控制项目拨款的减少。中央拨款份额的下降对较贫困邦产生了更为显著的影响,这些邦发现更难筹集当地资源来弥补这一收入损失。随着改革步伐的持续,未来邦政府增加医疗保健部门支出的可能性有限。结果,印度医疗保健部门出现了一些显著趋势。这些趋势包括非居民印度人(NRIs)对医院行业的投资增加,导致其原籍邦的公司化激增,以及跨国公司在诊断领域的参与度不断提高,旨在挖掘印度医疗保险市场的潜力。对这些私营举措的政策回应体现在一系列措施中,包括吸引私营部门参与和向初级卫生保健中心(PHCs)提供管理投入的战略、公立医院非临床服务等公共卫生设施的私有化或半私有化、通过非预算措施为公共卫生设施融资的创新方式,以及邦政府提供税收激励以鼓励私营部门对卫生部门的投资。鉴于这些市场力量和政策回应在塑造印度未来医疗保健格局方面的至关重要性,本文详细审视了这两个方面及其对印度医疗保健部门的影响。分析表明,尽管新出现的氛围充满希望,但市场力量存在局限性;应尝试对政府角色进行适当优化,以避免成本上升、不平等加剧和消费者受剥削等不良后果。这可能需要向跨国公司开放医疗保险市场、将税收激励合理引导至在落后地区设立医疗机构,并加强适当的监管机制。