Suppr超能文献

在印度,政府和家庭在一次住院治疗上的花费是多少?对恰蒂斯加尔邦公立医院和私立医院的比较。

How much do government and households spend on an episode of hospitalisation in India? A comparison for public and private hospitals in Chhattisgarh state.

作者信息

Garg Samir, Tripathi Narayan, Ranjan Alok, Bebarta Kirtti Kumar

机构信息

State Health Resource Centre, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, India.

Indian Institute of Technology, Jodhpur, India.

出版信息

Health Econ Rev. 2022 May 6;12(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s13561-022-00372-0.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Improvements in the financing of healthcare services are important for developing countries like India to make progress towards universal health coverage. Inpatient-care contributes to a big share of total health expenditure in India. India has a mixed health-system with a sizeable presence of private hospitals. Existing studies show that out-of-pocket expenditure (OOPE) incurred per hospitalisation in private hospitals was greater than public facilities. But, such comparisons have not taken into account the healthcare spending by government.

METHODS

For a valid comparison between public and for-profit private providers, this study in Indian state of Chhattisgarh assessed the combined spending by government and households per episode of hospitalisation. The supply-side and demand-side spending from public and private sources was taken into account. The study used two datasets: a) household survey for data on hospital utilisation, OOPE, cash incentives received by patients and claims raised under publicly funded health insurance (PFHI) schemes (n = 903 hospitalisation episodes) b) survey of public facilities to find supply-side government spending per hospitalisation (n = 64 facilities).

RESULTS

Taking into account all relevant demand and supply side expenditures, the average total spending per day of hospitalisation was INR 2833 for public hospitals and INR 6788 for private hospitals. Adjusted model for logarithmic transformation of OOPE while controlling for variables including case-mix showed that a hospitalisation in private hospitals was significantly more expensive than public hospitals (coefficient = 2.9, p < 0.001). Hospitalisations in private hospitals were more likely to result in a PFHI claim (adjusted-odds-ratio = 1.45, p = 0.02) and involve a greater amount than public hospitals (coefficient = 0.27, p < 0.001). Propensity-score matching models confirmed the above results. Overall, supply-side public spending contributed to 16% of total spending, demand-side spending through PFHI to 16%, cash incentives to 1% and OOPE to 67%. OOPE constituted 31% of total spending per episode in public and 86% in private hospitals.

CONCLUSIONS

Government and households put together spent substantially more per hospitalisation in private hospitals than public hospitals in Chhattisgarh. This has important implications for the allocative efficiency and the desired public-private provider-mix. Using public resources for purchasing inpatient care services from private providers may not be a suitable strategy for such contexts.

摘要

背景

改善医疗服务融资对于像印度这样的发展中国家朝着全民健康覆盖取得进展至关重要。住院治疗在印度总医疗支出中占很大比例。印度拥有一个公私混合的医疗体系,私立医院占相当大的比重。现有研究表明,私立医院每次住院的自付费用高于公立医院。但是,此类比较并未考虑政府的医疗支出。

方法

为了在公立和营利性私立医疗机构之间进行有效比较,本项针对印度恰蒂斯加尔邦的研究评估了政府和家庭每次住院的合并支出。研究考虑了来自公共和私人来源的供给侧和需求侧支出。该研究使用了两个数据集:a)家庭调查,用于获取医院利用情况、自付费用、患者获得的现金激励以及公共资助医疗保险(PFHI)计划下提出的索赔数据(n = 903次住院病例);b)对公共医疗机构的调查,以确定每次住院的供给侧政府支出(n = 64家机构)。

结果

考虑到所有相关的需求侧和供给侧支出,公立医院每次住院的日均总支出为2833印度卢比,私立医院为6788印度卢比。在控制包括病例组合等变量的同时,对自付费用进行对数转换的调整模型显示,私立医院的住院费用明显高于公立医院(系数 = 2.9,p < 0.001)。私立医院的住院治疗更有可能导致PFHI索赔(调整后的优势比 = 1.45,p = 0.02),且涉及的金额比公立医院更大(系数 = 0.27,p < 0.001)。倾向得分匹配模型证实了上述结果。总体而言,供给侧公共支出占总支出的16%,通过PFHI的需求侧支出占16%,现金激励占1%,自付费用占67%。自付费用在公立医院每次住院总支出中占31%,在私立医院中占86%。

结论

在恰蒂斯加尔邦,政府和家庭在私立医院的每次住院支出比公立医院大幅更高。这对配置效率和理想的公私医疗机构组合具有重要影响。在这种情况下,使用公共资源从私立医疗机构购买住院护理服务可能不是一个合适的策略。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验