Hay E, Bekerman L, Rosenberg G, Peled R
Emergency Department, the Barzilai Medical Center, Ashkelon, Israel.
Am J Emerg Med. 2001 Mar;19(2):113-7. doi: 10.1053/ajem.2001.21317.
The study objective was to evaluate the capability and the consistency of the triage nurse to categorize correctly emergency patients and its impact on the waiting time for physician examination over a period of 3 years. The study was performed at the emergency department of the Barzilai Medical Center, Ashkelon, Israel. A retrospective review of the medical records was performed. All patients who were examined by a triage nurse during 2 randomly chosen consecutive weeks during the years 1995 and 1998 participated. All the medical records were reviewed by the authors and the following information was extracted from the medical records: nurse triage category, time of initial evaluation by a triage nurse, duration of employment of the nurse in the ED, and her experience as a triage nurse, time of initial examination by a physician, the total length of stay in the ED, the history taken by the triage nurse and the physician, and the physician's urgency category. Patient in urgency category 1 is a patient whose condition may deteriorate if not examined within 1 hour; patient in category 2 is a patient whose condition may deteriorate if not examined within 2 hours; category 3 is all the rest. Any deterioration and or delay of treatment of the patients were also recorded. Data concerning patients with an initial complaint of chest pain were extracted separately. The data were analyzed using the SPSS software and the results were tested by the student t test and chi square test. Interobserver agreement was measured using the kappa value. A total of 2,886 completely full medical records were reviewed by the authors: 1,310 records from period I (1995) and 1576 from period II (1998). Of the patients 92% and 88.2% were classified by the triage nurse as category 3 in periods I and II respectively, 7% and 9.8% as category 2, and 1% and 2% as category 1 respectively. Full agreement of triage category between nurse and physician was found in 90.5% of the cases in period I and 93% in period II (kappa = 0.90 and kappa = 0.93 respectively). In period I, 70% of the patients in category 1 were examined by a physician in 1 hour versus 100% in period II. Almost all the patients in category 2 were examined within 2 hours (98%, 97%), and 98% of those in category 3 were examined within 3 hours. The average waiting time for physician examination in category 1 patients dropped from 43.1 minutes in period I to 18.2 minutes in period II. The average waiting time for the triage nurse was 9 minutes in period I, and 7.42 minutes in period II. The average length of stay in the ED in period I was 1 hour and 24 minutes and 1 hour and 30 minutes in period II. Of the anamneses taken by the triage nurse 91.8% were fully identical with the physicians' anamneses, but in period II this percentage jumped to 98%. Patients with chest pain were categorized correctly by the triage nurse in 76.8% of the cases in period I and 72.4% in period II, with an overtriage of 18.6% and 20.7% respectively (kappa = 0.75, kappa = 0.70 respectively). In our study, nurse triage was safe and effective in classifying patients to urgency categories. The results are consistent and even improved over a 3-year period. The rates of incorrect classification, deterioration, and delay of treatment of patients because of incorrect triage are very low. Most of the patients were examined by the physician within the expected time. Triage nurse predicted correctly the urgency category of patients with chest in most of the cases and the rate of missing acute coronary events was very low.
本研究的目的是评估分诊护士对急诊患者进行正确分类的能力和一致性,以及在3年期间其对医生检查等待时间的影响。该研究在以色列阿什凯隆的巴尔齐莱医疗中心急诊科进行。对病历进行了回顾性研究。纳入了在1995年和1998年随机选择的连续2周内由分诊护士检查的所有患者。作者对所有病历进行了审查,并从病历中提取了以下信息:护士分诊类别、分诊护士初始评估时间、护士在急诊科的工作年限及其作为分诊护士的经验、医生初始检查时间、在急诊科的总停留时间、分诊护士和医生采集的病史以及医生的紧急程度类别。紧急程度为1类的患者是指如果不在1小时内接受检查病情可能恶化的患者;2类患者是指如果不在2小时内接受检查病情可能恶化的患者;3类为其他所有患者。还记录了患者治疗的任何恶化和/或延迟情况。分别提取了以胸痛为初始主诉患者的数据。使用SPSS软件对数据进行分析,并通过学生t检验和卡方检验对结果进行检验。使用kappa值测量观察者间的一致性。作者共审查了2886份完整的病历:第一阶段(1995年)1310份记录,第二阶段(1998年)1576份记录。在第一阶段和第二阶段,分别有92%和88.2%的患者被分诊护士分类为3类,7%和9.8%为2类,1%和2%为1类。护士和医生之间分诊类别完全一致的情况在第一阶段为90.5%,在第二阶段为93%(kappa值分别为0.90和0.93)。在第一阶段,1类患者中有70%在1小时内接受了医生检查,而在第二阶段这一比例为100%。几乎所有2类患者在2小时内接受了检查(98%,97%),3类患者中有98%在3小时内接受了检查。1类患者医生检查的平均等待时间从第一阶段的43.1分钟降至第二阶段的18.2分钟。分诊护士的平均等待时间在第一阶段为9分钟,在第二阶段为7.42分钟。第一阶段在急诊科的平均停留时间为1小时24分钟,第二阶段为1小时30分钟。分诊护士采集的病史中有91.8%与医生的病史完全相同,但在第二阶段这一比例跃升至98%。以胸痛为初始主诉的患者在第一阶段76.8%的病例中被分诊护士正确分类,在第二阶段为72.4%,分别有18.6%和20.7%的过度分诊情况(kappa值分别为0.75和0.70)。在我们的研究中,护士分诊在将患者分类到紧急程度类别方面是安全有效的。结果具有一致性,并且在3年期间甚至有所改善。因错误分诊导致患者分类错误、病情恶化和治疗延迟的发生率非常低。大多数患者在预期时间内接受了医生检查。分诊护士在大多数情况下正确预测了胸痛患者的紧急程度类别,遗漏急性冠状动脉事件的发生率非常低。