Suppr超能文献

非医疗医院入院工作人员能否准确分诊急诊科患者?

Does nonmedical hospital admission staff accurately triage emergency department patients?

作者信息

Quitt Jonas, Ryser Daniel, Dieterle Thomas, Lüscher Urs, Martina Benedict, Tschudi Peter

机构信息

Interdisciplinary Emergency Department, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.

出版信息

Eur J Emerg Med. 2009 Aug;16(4):172-6. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0b013e32830c2193.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Utilization of hospital emergency departments (EDs) is continuously increasing. Though nurses and physicians are ultimately responsible for the definite triage decisions, initial ED patient triage is frequently performed by hospital admission staff. This study analyzes the quality of assessment of the severity of emergencies and the choice of treatment unit made by hospital admission staff.

METHODS

One thousand fifty-nine consecutive surgical and medical patients entering the ED of the University Hospital Basel during an 11-day period were independently assessed by hospital admission staff without formal medical training, ED nursing staff, and ED physicians. Emergencies were classified by severity (intervention within minutes/hours/days) or by severity and resource utilization (immediate intervention with/without life-threatening condition, delayed intervention with high/low/no demand of resources). Emergency assessment and triage decision (surgical/medical, outpatient/inpatient treatment) were documented independently by all three ED staff groups.

RESULTS

In 64% of the cases, initial assessment by admission staff corresponded with the final assessment by the ED physician. Concordance was, however, poor (kappa=0.23). Underestimation of the severity occurred in 7.5% of cases without severe or lethal consequences. Ninety-four percent of patients were treated in the unit to which they were originally triaged by the admission staff.

CONCLUSION

Triage quality regarding the choice of treatment unit was found to be excellent, whereas the quality of the assessment of the severity of the emergency by nonmedical ED admission staff was acceptable. ED patients have to be assessed by medical staff early after admission to ensure adequate and timely interventions.

摘要

目的

医院急诊科的利用率在持续上升。尽管护士和医生最终要对明确的分诊决策负责,但急诊科患者的初始分诊通常由医院入院工作人员进行。本研究分析了医院入院工作人员对紧急情况严重程度的评估质量以及治疗科室的选择情况。

方法

在11天的时间里,连续进入巴塞尔大学医院急诊科的1059名外科和内科患者由未经正规医学培训的医院入院工作人员、急诊科护理人员和急诊科医生进行独立评估。紧急情况按严重程度(数分钟/数小时/数天内进行干预)或按严重程度和资源利用情况(有/无危及生命情况的立即干预、高/低/无资源需求的延迟干预)进行分类。所有三个急诊科工作人员小组独立记录紧急情况评估和分诊决策(外科/内科、门诊/住院治疗)。

结果

在64%的病例中,入院工作人员的初始评估与急诊科医生的最终评估一致。然而,一致性较差(kappa = 0.23)。在7.5%的病例中发生了对严重程度的低估,且没有造成严重或致命后果。94%的患者在入院工作人员最初分诊的科室接受治疗。

结论

在治疗科室选择方面的分诊质量被发现非常好,而非医学的急诊科入院工作人员对紧急情况严重程度的评估质量是可以接受的。急诊科患者入院后必须尽早由医务人员进行评估,以确保进行充分和及时的干预。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验