Marginal quality and microleakage of adhesive class V restorations.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this in vitro study was to determine the marginal quality and microleakage of composite resin class V restorations.

METHODS

Standardized mixed class V cavities (diameter: 4mm, depth: 2mm) with half of the finish lines limited within dentin were cut in 90 freshly extracted human molars and randomly assigned to nine groups (n=10). After etching enamel and dentin, the cavities were restored with nine different restorative systems (Syntac Sprint/Tetric Ceram=SS, Syntac Single-Component/Tetric Ceram=SC, Onestep/Aeliteflo=OS, Aquaprep+Onestep/Aeliteflo=OA, Prime & Bond 2.1/TPH=PB, Optibond Solo/Prodigy=OP, Singlebond/Z100=SB, Tenure Quik/Marathon=TQ, Solobond M/Arabesk=SM) using a wet-bonding procedure. After finishing and polishing, the teeth were stored for 24h in distilled water at 37 degrees C before they were subjected to thermocycling (5/55 degrees C, 1000x). Epoxy replicas were made for margin analysis in the SEM. Specimens were stained in methylene blue, sectioned, and evaluated for microleakage. Dye penetration was scored on a 0-3 ordinal scale.

RESULTS

Statistical analysis (Kruskal-Wallis H-test, Mann-Whitney U-test) revealed significant differences (P<0.05) among the groups at dentin and enamel margins for the microleakage scores as well as for the results of the quantitative SEM margin analysis. SC revealed a significantly higher percentage of perfect margins in the SEM than OS and SM in enamel and dentin, respectively. OA exhibited significantly more leakage in enamel than all other groups.

CONCLUSIONS

None of the tested restorative systems achieved a perfect seal in dentin and enamel of mixed class V cavities. Marginal quality and sealing ability of adhesive systems to dentin, using a wet-bonding procedure, is still inferior compared with enamel margins.