Greenwood G L, Woods W J, Guydish J, Bein E
Center for AIDS Prevention Studies (CAPS), University of California, 74 New Montgomery, Ste. 502, San Francisco, CA 94105, USA.
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2001 Jan;20(1):15-23. doi: 10.1016/s0740-5472(00)00147-1.
Relapse outcomes at 6-, 12-, and 18-month intervals were compared between clients randomly assigned to day (n=114) versus residential (n=147) drug abuse treatment. Day clients were more likely than residential clients to relapse 6 months post-admission (OR=3.06, p<0.001); however, no setting differences at 12 or 18 months were found. Few baseline predictors were prospectively related to relapse at 12 and 18 months. These predictors were usual employment status (part-time OR=17.47, p<0.001; full-time OR=2.54, p<0.001), history of drug injecting (OR=5.39, p<0.01), multiple sex partners (OR=1.16, p<0.01), and not having a gay sexual partner (OR=0.05, p<0.03) during 6 months prior to admission. Still, these baseline predictors, together with the existing literature, could be used by drug treatment professionals to identify individuals who may be at high risk for relapse over time, and to offer specialized treatment and aftercare resources as intervention and prevention measures.
对随机分配到日间(n = 114)与住院(n = 147)药物滥用治疗的患者,比较了6个月、12个月和18个月间隔时的复发结果。日间治疗的患者比住院治疗的患者在入院后6个月更易复发(比值比[OR]=3.06,p<0.001);然而,在12个月或18个月时未发现治疗环境差异。很少有基线预测因素与12个月和18个月时的复发有前瞻性关联。这些预测因素包括通常的就业状况(兼职OR = 17.47,p<0.