Gion M, Mione R, Leon A E, Lüftner D, Molina R, Possinger K, Robertson J F
Center for the Study of Biological Markers of Malignancy, General Regional Hospital, ULSS 12, Venice, Italy.
Eur J Cancer. 2001 Feb;37(3):355-63. doi: 10.1016/s0959-8049(00)00396-8.
Recently, a fully automated method has become commercially available to measure the MUC-1-associated antigen CA27.29. The present investigation was performed in order to compare CA27.29 and CA15.3 in a wide series of patients affected with breast cancer. Overall, 603 cases with breast cancer and 194 healthy controls were investigated. Patients were enrolled in 4 institutions, while assays were performed in one laboratory. CA27.29 was measured by the ACS:180 BR assay (Bayer Diagnostics) and CA15.3 by the AxSYM (Abbott Laboratories). An excellent correlation was found between the results obtained by the two methods. The two markers showed comparable results in healthy controls, with higher levels in post-menopausal than in pre-menopausal subjects. The markers were significantly higher in primary breast cancer than in controls. The areas under the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves of the two tests were comparable, but CA27.29 showed better sensitivity in cases with low antigen concentrations (below the cut-off point). Accordingly, when comparing each test in different stage categories, significance levels of the differences were higher for CA27.29 than for CA15.3 for all T categories versus healthy controls, for pT1 versus pT2, for all N categories versus healthy controls and for node-negative versus N1-3 patients. From the results of the present study, that has been performed on samples taken at diagnosis and prior to any treatment from the widest series of patients with primary breast cancer reported so far, we can draw the following conclusions: CA27.29 provides comparable results to CA15.3; CA27.29 seems more sensitive than CA15.3 to limited variations of tumour extension; however, it cannot help clinicians in distinguishing stage I patients from stage II patients. However, from the point of view of clinical decision making, CA27.29 provides comparable results to CA15.3. CA27.29 is therefore suitable for routine use in the management of patients with breast cancer.
最近,一种用于测量与MUC-1相关抗原CA27.29的全自动方法已投入商业使用。本研究旨在比较CA27.29和CA15.3在大量乳腺癌患者中的情况。总共对603例乳腺癌患者和194名健康对照者进行了调查。患者来自4家机构,检测在一个实验室进行。CA27.29采用ACS:180 BR检测法(拜耳诊断公司)测定,CA15.3采用AxSYM检测法(雅培实验室)测定。两种方法所得结果之间存在极佳的相关性。两种标志物在健康对照者中结果相当,绝经后受试者的水平高于绝经前受试者。原发性乳腺癌患者的标志物水平显著高于对照组。两种检测的受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线下面积相当,但CA27.29在抗原浓度较低(低于临界值)的病例中显示出更好的敏感性。因此,在比较不同分期类别的各项检测时,CA27.29与健康对照相比,在所有T类别、pT1与pT2、所有N类别与健康对照以及无淋巴结转移与N1 - 3期患者中,差异的显著性水平均高于CA15.3。从本研究结果来看,该研究对迄今为止报道的最广泛系列的原发性乳腺癌患者在诊断时且未进行任何治疗之前采集的样本进行了检测,我们可以得出以下结论:CA27.29与CA15.3结果相当;CA27.29似乎比CA15.3对肿瘤范围的有限变化更敏感;然而,它无法帮助临床医生区分I期患者和II期患者。不过,从临床决策的角度来看,CA27.29与CA15.3结果相当。因此,CA27.29适用于乳腺癌患者管理的常规应用。