Suppr超能文献

脾非手术治疗的失败:是杯子半空还是半满?

Failures of splenic nonoperative management: is the glass half empty or half full?

作者信息

Bee T K, Croce M A, Miller P R, Pritchard F E, Fabian T C

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN 38163, USA.

出版信息

J Trauma. 2001 Feb;50(2):230-6. doi: 10.1097/00005373-200102000-00007.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Published contraindications to nonoperative management (NOM) of blunt splenic injury (BSI) include age > or = 55, Glasgow Coma Scale score < or = 13, admission blood pressure < 100 mm Hg, major (grades 3-5) injuries, and large amounts of hemoperitoneum. Recently reported NOM rates approximate 60%, with failure rates of 10% to 15%. This study evaluated our failures of NOM for BSI relative to these clinical factors.

METHODS

All patients with BSI at a Level I trauma center over a 46-month period ending September 1999 were reviewed. Failures of NOM included patients initially selected for NOM who subsequently required splenectomy/splenorrhaphy.

RESULTS

Five hundred fifty-eight had BSI. Twenty-three percent (128) underwent emergent laparotomy for hemodynamic instability and 77% (430) were observed. The NOM failure rate was only 8%. Univariate analysis identified moderate to large hemoperitoneum (p < 0.03), grades 3 to 5 (p < 0.004), and age > or = 55 (p < 0.0006) as being significantly associated with failure. Multivariate analysis identified age > or = 55 and grades 3 to 5 injuries as independent predictors of failure. The highest failure rates (30-40%) occurred in patients age > or = 55 with major injury for moderate to large hemoperitoneum. Mortality rates for successful NOM were 12%, and 9% for failed NOM.

CONCLUSION

Inclusion of all high-risk patients increased the NOM rate while maintaining a low failure rate. Although age > or = 55 and major BSI were independently associated with failure of NOM, approximately 80% of these high-risk patients were successfully managed nonoperatively. There was no increased mortality associated with failure. Although these factors may indeed predict failure, they do not necessarily contraindicate NOM.

摘要

背景

已公布的钝性脾损伤(BSI)非手术治疗(NOM)的禁忌证包括年龄≥55岁、格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分≤13分、入院时血压<100mmHg、严重(3 - 5级)损伤以及大量腹腔积血。最近报道的NOM成功率约为60%,失败率为10%至15%。本研究评估了相对于这些临床因素而言,我们在BSI的NOM治疗中的失败情况。

方法

回顾了截至1999年9月的46个月期间,一级创伤中心所有BSI患者。NOM失败包括最初选择接受NOM治疗但随后需要行脾切除术/脾修补术的患者。

结果

558例患者有BSI。23%(128例)因血流动力学不稳定接受了急诊剖腹手术,77%(430例)接受了观察。NOM失败率仅为8%。单因素分析确定中度至大量腹腔积血(p<0.03)、3至5级损伤(p<0.004)以及年龄≥55岁(p<0.0006)与失败显著相关。多因素分析确定年龄≥55岁和3至5级损伤是失败的独立预测因素。年龄≥55岁且伴有严重损伤及中度至大量腹腔积血的患者失败率最高(30% - 40%)。NOM成功患者的死亡率为12%,NOM失败患者的死亡率为9%。

结论

纳入所有高危患者可提高NOM成功率,同时保持低失败率。虽然年龄≥55岁和严重BSI与NOM失败独立相关,但这些高危患者中约80%通过非手术治疗成功。失败与死亡率增加无关。虽然这些因素确实可能预测失败,但它们不一定是NOM的禁忌证。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验